PDA

View Full Version : GMO Grass grass suddenly began producing cyanide, kills cows.


Dennis Hultman
06-24-2012, 12:22 AM
http://www.weareaustin.com/news/top-stories/stories/vid_2393.shtml

A mysterious mass death of a herd of cattle has prompted a federal investigation in Central Texas.

Preliminary test results are blaming the deaths on the grass the cows were eating when they got sick.

The cows dropped dead several weeks ago on a ranch in Elgin, just east of Austin.

Jerry Abel opens the gate on his 80-acre ranch in Elgin, walking on a field of grass he's been using for cattle grazing and hay for 15 years.

"This is it, a lot of leaf, it's good, grass, tested high for protein - it should have been perfect," said Abel.

The grass is a genetically modified form of Bermuda known as Tifton 85 which has been growing here for 15 years, feeding Abel's 18 head of Corriente cattle. Corriente are used for team roping because of their small size and horns.

"When we opened that gate to that fresh grass, they were all very anxious to get to that," said Abel.

Three weeks ago, the cattle had just been turned out to enjoy the fresh grass, when something went terribly wrong.

"When our trainer first heard the bellowing, he thought our pregnant heifer may be having a calf or something," said Abel. "But when he got down here, virtually all of the steers and heifers were on the ground. Some were already dead, and the others were already in convulsions."

Within hours, 15 of the 18 cattle were dead.

"That was very traumatic to see, because there was nothing you could do, obviously, they were dying," said Abel.

Dr. Gary Warner, an Elgin veterinarian who specializes in cattle, conducted the 15 necropsy. Preliminary tests revealed the Tifton 85 grass, which has been here for years, had suddenly started producing cyanide gas, poisoning the cattle.

"Coming off the drought that we had the last two years, we're concerned it was a combination of events that led us to this," said Warner. "The problem is, we don't know, and there needs to be some caution exercised until we know more about the situation."

Until scientists can determine why this tried and true grass suddenly began producing cyanide, Abel is keep his livestock far away.

"The grasshoppers are enjoying it now," said Abel.

What is even more worrisome - other farmers have tested their Tifton 85 grass, and several in Bastrop County have found their fields are also toxic with cyanide, although no other cattle have died.

Scientists at the U.S. Department of Agriculture are dissecting the grass to determine if there might have been some strange, unexpected mutation.

Shadera
06-24-2012, 12:51 AM
Great! They're determined to stop us producing our own food, no matter what it takes.

Personally, I plan to use Salatin's method of rotation, and encourage the good native stuff to grow for feed.

aleria
06-24-2012, 09:09 PM
Considering how against grass fed cattle the government/fda/monsanto is, I do not find this surprising. And the fact that this was already gmo grass to begin with, how hard would it be for Monsanto to change the recipe a little bit, just enough to suddenly turn it to cyanide.

Metachrosis
06-25-2012, 10:42 AM
:ack2:

http://truth-out.org/news/item/9961-monsanto-trumps-food-safety-and-democracy-again

WebSlave
06-25-2012, 12:58 PM
:ack2:

http://truth-out.org/news/item/9961-monsanto-trumps-food-safety-and-democracy-again

Well, this comes as no surprise. It's pretty obvious that our "representatives" have rings through their noses put there by industry (money) who pull the strings attached to those rings.

Metachrosis
06-25-2012, 01:58 PM
Cows today,human populous tomorrow . . . .

Metachrosis
06-25-2012, 07:48 PM
:censored:

aleria
06-25-2012, 08:37 PM
And it's sad how many people look at things like that and the rare news articles that actually tell some of the truth about Monsanto and the others like it and think of it as some nut job, conspiracy theory, joke.

But of course americans being spoon-fed BS by faux news and it's counterparts and just swallowing it down without question doesn't help. Because "Why would they lie to us? That's ridiculous, they couldn't possibly want to harm our own country and citizens! That'd be unpatriotic and this is Amurica!" :angry:

WebSlave
06-25-2012, 09:16 PM
I'm sorry, but anyone who believes the major media networks are there to present us with an unbiased rendition of "news" and commentary is severely naive. Which is exactly why the FREEDOM of access to the internet has been under attack to try to take away this conduit of information away from us.

I'm pretty much convinced that spam (and possibly hackers using malicious programs) is a ploy to get us to BEG the government to put controls in place to protect us from that nuisance. Which I am certain they will be glad to do. With a SERIOUS hidden hook in that bait.

Dennis Hultman
06-27-2012, 06:16 PM
nuTMBARYPNM

Dennis Hultman
05-31-2013, 11:25 AM
Modified Wheat Is Discovered in Oregon

Unapproved genetically engineered wheat has been found growing on a farm in Oregon, federal officials said Wednesday, a development that could disrupt American exports of the grain.
Related

The Agriculture Department said the wheat was of the type developed by Monsanto to be resistant to the herbicide Roundup, also known as glyphosate. Such wheat was field-tested in 16 states, including Oregon, from 1998 through 2005, but Monsanto dropped the project before the wheat was ever approved for commercial planting.

The department said it was not known yet whether any of the wheat got into the food supply or into grain shipments. Even if it did, officials said, it would pose no threat to health. The Food and Drug Administration reviewed the wheat and found no safety problems with it in 2004.

Still, the mere presence of the genetically modified plant could cause some countries to turn away exports of American wheat, especially if any traces of the unapproved grain were found in shipments. About $8.1 billion in American wheat was exported in 2012, representing nearly half the total $17.9 billion crop, according to U.S. Wheat Associates, which promotes American wheat abroad. About 90 percent of Oregon’s wheat crop is exported.

While most American soybeans and corn are genetically modified, those crops are largely consumed by animals or made into processed foods. Wheat is consumed directly by people and there has been more consumer resistance. No genetically engineered wheat has been approved in any country. Indeed, one reason Monsanto dropped its development of genetically modified wheat in 2004 was concern from American farmers that it would endanger wheat exports.

Monsanto has now resumed research into genetically modified wheat but says it will be at least a decade before any such crop reaches the market.

Michael Firko, acting deputy administrator for biotechnology regulatory services in the Agriculture Department’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, said countries that import a lot of American wheat were being notified. Japan and Mexico are among the biggest importers.

In 2006, after traces of an unapproved genetically engineered rice were found in the American harvest, rice prices dropped, at least temporarily, and exports slowed.

Bayer CropScience, the company that developed and field-tested the rice, agreed to pay $750 million to settle claims with about 11,000 American farmers.

Mr. Firko said the rice situation was different because the grain was found in commercial supplies. In the case of the wheat, the genetically modified plants were growing where they were not wanted, like a weed.

When the farmer tried to kill them with glyphosate, “a small percentage of them didn’t die,” Mr. Firko said. The farmer had them tested at Oregon State University, which found the Roundup-resistant gene in them. That finding has since been confirmed by the Agriculture Department.

Mr. Firko said federal agents were now trying determine whether there was any more genetically engineered wheat.

“We have no information about whether there is anything in the food supply or the grain supply,” he said. “We’re all over this. We have nine investigators combing the area.”

He said the same farmer — who was not identified — had another field two miles away planted with the same wheat. About 50 volunteer wheat plants found in that field were tested and no genetically engineered plants were detected, he said.

He said it was not clear how the wheat got to the farmer’s field. The last field test of that type of wheat in Oregon was in 2001, he said.

The discovery in Oregon was seized upon Wednesday by supporters of a ballot initiative in nearby Washington State that would require genetically modified foods to be labeled.

Monsanto said in a statement that it was cooperating with the Agriculture Department, but said it believed the finding was either invalid or highly unusual. “There is considerable reason to believe that the presence of the Roundup Ready trait in wheat, if determined to be valid, is very limited,” it said.

Blake Rowe, chief executive of the Oregon Wheat Commission, said wheat growers were “very concerned.” He said they hoped the investigation was completed before the harvest began, in a few weeks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/business/energy-environment/genetically-engineered-wheat-found-in-oregon-field.html?_r=0

Dennis Hultman
06-01-2013, 04:56 PM
Terrence Ingram, a world renowned naturalist who once saved the Bald Eagle from being on the endangered species list, was recently met by the Illinois Agricultural Department which seized his privately-owned bees. The department seized his bees that were 'resistant to GMO pesticides' and killed the remaining healthy queen bees in his beehives.

Ingram had been researching the effects of Roundup, the Monsanto franken-food best-selling herbicide meant to make crops more resilient to pests. Roundup itself has long list of negative effects, with the product even shown to kill human kidney cells. Much of the ill effects of Roundup are produced by the active ingredient, glyphosate.

Ingram has been raising his bees for 58 years and researching Roundup's effects on the bees for 15+ years. "They ruined 15 years of my research," he told Prairie Advocate, by stealing most of his stock. You can surmise, that the results of his research were not likely a glowing report on the benefits of GMO pesticides.

______________________