Exactly my thoughts as well Tyler!

This is better.


http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...ps99f6e002.png

If only I had $40,000.

I particularly enjoy how she addressed the unlikelihood of breeding any offspring back to Mom.

There are many interesting points that she made.

Pathetic.

That is an obvious attempt to try to cast doubt on my ad for a hypo cherryhead animal since Jodi is now trying to unload the supposed "sunset hypo" and replace the income stream with " neon dwarf vanilla babcocki" nonsense, now made somewhat more difficult due the information revealed in this thread.

Endoscopic sexing does not render animals infertile. A ten inch animal should be able to breed now. Nine more years? That is *highly* suspicious. Makes me wonder if there is an issue somebody is hoping a buyer will wait nine years to realize.

At least the hypomelanistic redfoots the Pattersons have are real hypos, so that is cool.

By the way, the gene is the same across lines. Probably the same locus. This is not like incompatible albinism/amelanism strains with different portions of the pathway being affected by different genes. When people try to say different sources of leucistic sulcatas or hypomelanistic carbonaria are incompatible with each other, it is usually either 1) misunderstanding or 2) willful myth to try to lock in customers.

Anyway, it is a shame that he/she/they resorted to this. It will only draw more negative attention to them.

Thanks for posting that, Josh.

due to* the

Quite odd indeed, If I bought a 10" hypo and I didn't have any viable offspring for 10 years or longer I would be extremely disappointed and think that I was sold an infertile animal. 10 years would be the scenic route for a neonate, it shouldn't be the case with an adult sized animal.

I'm not going to pile on even though it sure looks bad for Wanda so far. I will say the statement regarding endoscopy causing infertility is ludicrous. I have never heard any credible source or anyone else for that matter make such a claim.