|
Dan, stop rehashing the same BS line. Their was no concrete physical evidence that she did it. However she had motive and her behavior is a clear indication of guilt. Their was plenty of evidence, just not what the jury expected in today's age of technology. Do you think 10-20 years ago they based a guilty charge solely on DNA? Of course their would be no DNA evidence when the body was left out in a swamp for months! To think otherwise is just asinine. Did you stop and think maybe she delayed telling the police and lead them on a wild goose chase for months because she was waiting for the DNA to degrade?
They didn't even charge her with "being a bad parent" (ie. child abuse). They let her walk on every meaningful count against her even though her "defense" was that the child drowned under her supervision. What happened was disgusting and people defending the decision made by that idiotic jury is disgusting. I hope she gets what she deserves in the end.
|