|
"I continued soaking him for several days."
Stated by the OP, but then the OP did not have time to take him to a vet.
Neglecting to mention you were offered a FULL refund, and CHOSE to pay shipping on a second "replacement" snake while also keeping the first deformed snake as well.
Neglecting to mention that when the replacement died(after you failed to even seek vet treatment for "several days" at least), you were given a full refund.
Saying that the Black rat is actually a yellow rat, and that Ken must have just picked out a rat snake at random to fill a black ratsnake order, yet saying the ratsnake is fine later without mentioning it being wrong at all.
Seems to me that you're being dishonest in representing the deal almost entirely. It would have been best if you recieved a perfect, healthy snake to begin with. But when it was imperfect, the seller did what he could do, he offered a full refund. You ASKED for a replacement, and were informed it was full refund OR you could pay shipping on a replacement. Would it be nice to get the replacement without paying shipping? Yes. But you still had the option of taking a full refund instead.
Perhaps you didn't think that anyone would question the facts of the deal when you posted a Bad Guy thread full of misdirection and falsehood?
|