|
At Bobby:
1) Maybe, but I don’t happen to see being direct as a bad thing so it wasn’t an insult.
2) Well Mitch is the one who un-apologetically called Jerry’s collection a “pathogen hotspot” so he was the obvious call out. Otherwise, I only said that “if the shoe was on the other foot Mitch would be taking a wait and see approach too.” I hardly see where this is something to take offense at.
3) I was not accusing Stu of the neglect far from it, I was just exploring how the impasse was arrived at. I tend to think that stress induced during shipment triggered some metabolic and or behavioral mods that led to the condition.
4) “All Stu has to write is that you have refunded his money and it's over.” Maybe, we’ll see.
I think that covers it. Peace Brother.
|