Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel Rojas
It wouldn't. To be het for a gene the gene must be recessive not co-dom. That's like me saying that my tigers are 100% het for super tigers. Although that's true we don't say it that way. And not all granite backs are het for anthrax, just ask NERD as they have several for sale.
|
Wrong, if there is a super form it can be het and be co-dominant. In the ball python world a yellowbelly is also called het ivory, a fire is a het for black eye leucistic.
Also if a het to het breeding was done on recessives the non visual babies would be 66% het not 50%