i liked dan's suggestion. i'd definately post underneath this guy's post.
as far as laws go, for all art the laws changed several years ago. as i understand it, all art is copyrighted whether there is a signature or not--many artists had considered signatures obstructive to the viewing of the image, and this was part of the reason for this change. i suppose it is a lot easier to put a sig on the image for proof, but i would suspect your website is proof enough.
dana
|