Correct, Elena. Wayne, bear in mind that many hobbyists are very resistant to accepting this new nomenclature; I see their point, since much useful information is lost (though much more is gained, of course) with the change. (A very similar situation recently occurred in the
Lampropeltis triangulum complex).
I believe this is the paper that establishes this taxonomy:
Wood, et al. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46 (2008) 484–502
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&p...DMwNWMyZDZiNmE