FaunaClassifieds - View Single Post - usark lawsuit
Thread: usark lawsuit
View Single Post
Old 10-15-2015, 08:53 PM   #63
rodneynboalich
You are posting a law that applies to animals that are not listed as invasive or injurious... but are still covered under lacey on the grounds of original violation...such as state laws...or in the case of cities animals. An animal that was collected/transported illegally....


The section of lacey act / legal code a separate part...It's not dealing with invasive or injurious species directly but covers all..an this section of the legal code has to be set a part because..injurious /invasive listing are spacific to us law and are not subject to cities laws and the spacific laws of other countries....but does come into play in terms of cities agreement to uphold the laws of the countries involved in cities..which is around 130 of them...that's why it's illegal for indonesia to ship retics to the US...because of the cities clause agreements...which is separate from the law you are referring to in you post which is dealing with original offense making interstate and other form of transportation illegal, but is still under lacey act...the law you are posting is what makes it illegal import a bear skin from the US to Hawaii when the bear was killed illegally.........

Indonesia sending retics or any other species listed as invasive or injurious to the US is illegal because of they US listing them as such and under the cities agreement countries will uphold the laws and regulations of other countries ..

the US government can list species as invasive or injurious....and your post saying that they can't ban them is just wrong....they can ban them and regulate them...if they couldn't there would be no invasive or injurious listing there would also be no guidelines for what's consider illegal behavior with listed species and there would be no min/max legal pentilties..and last time I checked we have all of those things.