Quote:
Originally Posted by ApexPredatorBoids
You're bending over backwards pretty far in your apparent mission to miss the point: This transaction was between A and B. C and D, and their interactions with A or B, are absolutely irrelevant in regards to the seller fixing his own mistake in not supplying A with what he purchased; a live boa.
|
The other two men that involved themselves are very relevant here, I believe. Especially since they are all supposed partners. So, my point is, Im not justifying keeping the money, BUT i DO understand his hesitation after everything that has transpired.[/quote]
The OP said something along the lines of "I had extra money laying around so I bought the snake". As I don't have the ambition to dig through the thread and find the exact quote, I'm paraphrasing. Again, he laid out his own money for this purchase. It's ridiculous to say that the actions of those he had a mentor/potential breeding loan arrangement with has any direct bearing on the fact that he's now $4600 poorer with absolutely nothing to show for it.[/quote]
I didnt miss the point and I completely understand that the deal was between andrew and kevin. My point was that with the blackmail and "partnership" with the other two men, I can understand Andrew feeling suspicious and being hesitant. I never condoned him not refunding or replacing. I just stated that with everything being as fishy as it is, I can understand him being hesitant. I still believe that the other two men are relevant to the whole picture though.