|
I am one of the "declarants" in this case, and one of two who was admitted even by FWS to actually have standing. Very, very simply, , it basically means that they are arguing that the economic impact being felt is not mundane to this clause of the law which is environmental, not economic.
They also claim a 6-year statute of limitations bars the suit (this is BS from a legal standpoint and is just one more point they are using to obfuscate the issue).
Finally, they say even IF the environmental claim is valid that there is no injury to USARKK or its members.
|