Originally Posted by ianedward1

And that's exactly what BOI is here to help you decide. Like I said, I think both parties have fault here for being hotheaded instead of just the dealer. Buddy believed he was not revising the emails and he was insulted that such a thought could be possible. He did do the right thing by stating they got wires crossed, but then Buddy wanted to step up to the plate for a telling match. I personally don't understand not being fine with having a snake cared for at no cost while you are absent. I have been there myself. If I put the money down, then that means I want that animal and no other. Obviously, the buyer thought he was getting screwed I assume. In my dealings though, I would say that Buddy was legitimately offering to care for the animal if that is what it took. That's just all I can say.