Originally Posted by ShadowAceD

It is about the money. It is not up to you to become the moral compass of the world and decide you can hold someone's money hostage because you feel they wronged you when you failed to provide them with the product they paid for because you made mistakes. Mistakes you owned up to in the beginning but now refute as potentially created by Kevin. You say it is possible he killed the animal in a weird attempt at blackmail that he supposedly planned ahead. You have no proof of this, but it is what you claim. There is proof you are the cause of the animal's death, but that is something you are now recanting on. All of this is just plain arrogance and I am a bit dumbfounded at it, honestly.