|
[quote=Mike (The M);1971101]Well, I'm not an attorney. But I can tell you that slandering has to be verbal. This would only be considered libel, and it has to be false. Since all of it is true, there is no grounds. He would also have to prove a tangible loss to his business.
I find it highly amusing that he stated previously he was above all of this, but secretly reached out to Rich to try and have it removed. People try to throw these words around to sound smart. I do not doubt his intelligence, as I do believe his history indicates that he was a real estate mogul once upon a time, and that is where he made his money.
I have no doubt that he is well versed in the language of legalese, and how to present a good case on its face. But that is
Whoever wrote it is not well versed at all, be it his lawer or him pretending to be a lawer, it was a laughable attempt.
|