|
Evolution vs. Creationism isn't even really a valid apples-to-apples discussion. The former pertains to what likely happened after self-replicating life appeared; the latter focuses on the very appearance of life. The two aren't necessarily mutually exclusive propositions. If one chooses to believe in some sentient prime mover, it would be simple enough to simply say that entity willed primordial life into existence and set further evolution in motion. I think a goodly number of theists have adopted just such a stance to reconcile belief with evidence. I think abiogenesis vs. creationism is probably the more interesting (heated) discussion to be had.
|