FaunaClassifieds - View Single Post

03-17-2019, 05:23 PM

I am sure I missed something somewhere with this, but I read the opening post in that thread concerning the request from NZ police no less than four (4) times and the way I read it all the police were doing was asking the website owner to RETAIN any info concerning said posts for a probable investigation. The purpose behind it was just in case the posts might be subject to being deleted, under standard maintenance or through administrative action, they wanted to prevent that possibility before they could formally and officially file a request for information related to such posts.

I don't see this as any sort of censorship at all. Quite the reverse, actually. They were asking that the posts REMAIN publicly available and NOT be deleted.

I only read through page 5 of the thread (got tired of the chest thumping), so maybe something more enlightening was posted later on there.

Anyway, if I am missing something, please let me know.

03-17-2019, 05:23 PM	#2
WebSlave	I am sure I missed something somewhere with this, but I read the opening post in that thread concerning the request from NZ police no less than four (4) times and the way I read it all the police were doing was asking the website owner to RETAIN any info concerning said posts for a probable investigation. The purpose behind it was just in case the posts might be subject to being deleted, under standard maintenance or through administrative action, they wanted to prevent that possibility before they could formally and officially file a request for information related to such posts. I don't see this as any sort of censorship at all. Quite the reverse, actually. They were asking that the posts REMAIN publicly available and NOT be deleted. I only read through page 5 of the thread (got tired of the chest thumping), so maybe something more enlightening was posted later on there. Anyway, if I am missing something, please let me know.