Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeCurtin
No...pointing to an existing thread is not condescending. The way in which you do it is.
|
The Feedback Forum is your friend....
http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/foru...d.php?t=249378
Yeah... Sure looks condescending to me.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeCurtin
I don't think I'm biased...actually, I'm probably less biased than most posting on this thread.
No chip on my shoulder...we bumped heads and I walked away for a little while. I did so because of the way you responded to me and to others when called out on what is considered by many to be an irresponsible practice. You still treat people in the same manner....just because I notice it doesn't mean I have a chip on my shoulder.
|
We both know what went down then, Mike, and the false and attempted damaging accusation you made towards me. Sorry that it offended you that I proved you wrong, but that's just the way it happens sometimes. And in that same incident someone cut and pasted a California statute and tried to claim it was a Florida statute to prove that I had broken a Florida law. I guess he probably feels I was condescending towards him as well when I proved his attempted deception. Sorry, but if it is condescending to prove someone incorrect, inaccurate, or deceptive in their accusations and claims, well yes, I guess I am guilty as charged, then.
If pointing someone to an existing thread is condescending to a minority of disgruntled people who just want to bitch about something about me (no matter what, as long as it is AGAINST me and/or this site), then I guess I will continue to be guilty of that charge as well.
