|
Well I think it could belong here if A) Al had some evidence he wanted to post that in some transaction Justyn had acted unethically or b) Justyn could offer proof that Al not just warned Justyn but actually did make some post or take some action against Justyn without actuall evidence of wrong-doing. I think either of those instances could certainly involve poor business ethics.
But I agree with a previous poster we're basically expected to go on the word of one or the other when we don't really know Justyn did anything unethical to Al or that Al did anything unethical to Justyn.
And I'm sorry Justyn but I don't think the email you posted really shows evidence that he's done anything. Even if it is a threat it's just a threat which may be mean but it's not evidence that Al took any unethical action.
|