Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt2979
Paul, do you have any screen shots of the ad that you bought this snake from? Or any other way to prove (to Outback Reptiles) that this is indeed the same snake that they sent you? The ONLY problem that I see with the time lapse is if there is no way to identify the snake. If they can, it would be pretty stupid to send back a female that the OP claims is male.
When I sell 100% hets, I send them with a photo ID. But if the animal is not het for anything, there's no paperwork so remembering each and every snake (without the paperwork) could be next to impossible (for a larger company like OR). As far as the OP trying to get over on the seller by using a male that he didn't even need, I just don't understand how that could possibly benefit him.
|
I guess my posts reflect the fact that I'm not taking anything he is "SAYING" as fact. Photo of the snake may make the seller want to make amends if he's leaning that way. But the basis of MY opinion is that the TOS is expired. The seller and buyer have equal responsibility (again, imo).
I am sorry, but I see a TOS as protection on BOTH sides, not just the buyer's. There was enough time for him to check. The TOS is given for protection on both sides.
As to why/whether or not he would do something so stupid...that was purely speculation (on my part) as to a why IF the pictures were, in fact, an attempt to deceive...stupider things have been done.
