|
I can't help but agree that more identifiable proof needs to be presented before a refund is given. Based on the few inches of snake that are visible in that pic, and the low quality of the pic in general. It would be near impossible to match that pic to one from when Josh sold it.
This is an easy fix....better proof of the claim, full refund. Yall decide between you who gets the snake. Done.
I would ask someone for a better picture regardless of how much time had past (1 hour or 1 year) because I would want to be 100% sure that it was the animal I sold.
Everyone here knows how often things can turn around and NOT be what we all expected. So even tho there may not be a reason to suspect the OP is being dishonest, does that mean we should just roll over and believe him? Without 100% proof of the snake in question's identity?
Other then that....I have no opinion on the rest of this conversation.
|