clear up a few things
ok we know the ip that was looked up was his.
but I have not seen any proof where the said ip came from.
it is said it was the offending ip but should we take somebodys word?
what i am getting at is that you could have got his ip anywhere and constructed this elaborate conviction.
also if you can prove where the ip came from and it all is true has he broken any laws?
or has he just gotten someone mad which is not a broken law as far as i know?
This said infraction did not happen here so what is the point of this a lot of the said good guys are bad guys and some bad guys good guys ect...
I see no real scam but a possible liar which could include many.
so you must include documents proving where the offenging ip was found.
sorry nobodys word is going to convict anyone except gods.
|