|
It seems like not producing visual hets in the first few clutches would not be beyond "reasonable doubt" or whatever the legal standard is, in terms of Chris being so sure the seller is going to be dragged off to prison for this "scam". He has a contract in place if they turtles don't prove out that would address that in a civil case. Why he didn't simply follow the contract he himself signed in good faith I can't imagine.....he has posted his answer to that question but I still have no idea. It's caused a lot of fuss, travel and legal fees, and unless he's really lucky, a countersuit against him. And it just seems unnecessary and has he caused himself more harm that good. I can't imagine ANYBODY who reads these threads will want to ever enter a transaction with Chris - why take the risk?
|