Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chameleon Company
Sammy,
Nope. You can start a thread about me, and wail away about my objectivity. Or continue to wail away here if it suits you. But the thread was in confidence, regarding clearly stated criminal matters. Everything said was in that context, as was it clearly stated that all was in confidence. I won't put you in that predicament again. Interesting quote by Mr. Johnson, BTW.
|
I suggest you re-read that PM you sent me Jim. NO WHERE did it say that it was in confidence, let alone "clearly stated that all was in confidence". I would really hate to have to break out the LIAR card on you Jim but that is exactly what you are doing right now by saying that. Maybe you MEANT to say that in the PM but you most certainly did not. I suggest you re-read what you sent me.
But do allow me to say this, any PM I am sent is just that.... PRIVATE. That is why I asked you in the first place. But dont go playing some game with me by saying that you "clearly stated that was all in confidence" because that is a flat out LIE, Jim. You sir are a LIAR.
Also Jim, the part about your relationship with them has NOTHING to do with criminal matters.
Threaded Mode
