I've just read this thread straight through and I'm a bit confused.
If k-9 and mpiexotics wouldn't mind answering a few questions just so I can sort a few things out for myself and get a clear picture of the situation, I'd appreciate it.
If it isn't too much trouble, could you both answer the following questions-
- What was the original deal? How many geckos of what ages and genders for how many of what snakes?
- Was there a stop shipment placed on the delivery of either package?
- If so, what time was the stop delivery placed? Not what time Airborne actually stopped it, but what time and how was the delivery asked to be stopped?
- Were both packages delivered? What time?
- If not, which package was not delivered?
- Do you both agree that the picture containing all seven animals is of the animals shipped?
- If a delivery was never made on one side, why is there a problem here? Just ship back the other animals and be done with it. No "I'm keeping them because you tried to send me sick animals" or "They need better care." Just get all the animals back to their original owners and be done with it. Split shipping costs 50/50
- How many geckos were DOA? Can you provide some proof of the number by providing e-mails that state a DOA number from the date of shipping?
- Aren't Blizzards solid white all the time with funny eyes? I don't know gecko morphs all that well but those pictures look like Leusistics to me. I'm probably wrong but... Were the animals shipped blizzards or not?
- I think I already asked this but I want to be sure to get it in... Do both parties agree that the pictured geckos are the geckos that were shipped?
- To finish it off I was just wondering if either of you think it's cruel that the word "Lisp" has an "S" in it. Because that doesn't seem right to me and it's been bothering me since someone mentioned it to me two weeks ago.
I think that a lot of confusion can be cleared up if these questions are answered all at once in a straightforward manner.
I don't think that a clear, straightforward story has been given here yet and I think that, even with pictures posted as they have been, the truth isn't known. I firmly believe that if the situation is exactly as I understand it to be right now based on limited information that this can be cleared up very quickly by simply shipping the property of each person back to them and ending it. My initial response was going to be to jump all over mpiexotics as well but I read the thread late and noticed that Rob advised caution and stated that he didn't think the individual involved would ship starving or crushed geckos... I suppose that reliance on someone's word at face value is sometimes inappropriate but there are a few people who I would trust based off nothing else having never even met them... If Rob says that mpiexotics is not a bad guy... then he is not a bad guy. He may have made a mistake... but he is not some evil fiend from the pit of hell come to ship us leopard geckos.
Further, from the way I read it so far, mpiexotics has nothing in his posession whereas k-9 has mpiexotics' animals and has offered nothing in return and threatened to keep them pending some unspecified resolution. If I'm wrong about that, just tell me- it wouldn't be the first time.
At this point I'll just sit back and wait for those questions to be answered. If they will be.
k-9 and mpiexotics, I know both you guys have probably answered those questions before but it sometimes helps to answer them all at once in a linear fashion like this so that people can easily compare the answers and see where the deviations are... the root of the problem essentially. I'd like to thank both of you in advance for taking the time to answer these questions again for the benifit of others reading and I hope you both find some sort of amicable solution that leaves both parties satisfied that they weren't ripped off if not happy.