Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWReptiles
I purchased 5 hets in total from Ron, these hets were sold with the guarentee of (word for word from the paperwork)
"I guarantee the above listed ball pythons are 100% het albino. If bred to an albino male they should produce albinos the first year. If bred to a het albino male they may not produce albinos until the second breeding. Gaurantee based on above breedings."
Buying these things was obviously a stupid idea on my part and I knew it was a dumb idea for about a year now. I didn't however, know that the deal was going to be "settled" by me getting a refund and sending the snakes back until today. Ron has told me numerous times since I explained my concern that he would " take care of me".
|
Al
Based on the info both of you have provided (and let me say that since virtually none of the facts of the situation seem to be in dispute it is obvious to me that you are both honest and straightforward guys) tell me if this synopsis of the situation is accurate.
1.) You purchased the animals for approximately 1/3 of the then current retail value
2.) Ron was up front and told you that the reason he was selling the animals so far below market was that Rick Miller, not Ron, had produced the animals and he could not verify beyond a shadow of a doubt that the animals were hets.
3.) He offerred a vague guaranty that you accepted as to the genetics but no specific remedy was ever stated or discussed.
He is now saying that he will honor the guaranty if they do not prove out (which is the expected result) by repurchasing the animals at their original purchase price.
If this is correct than it seems that the only dispute here are the specifics of implementing the guaranty. Since no specific remedy was ever discussed the guaranty is obviously open to a massive range of interpretation. It does seem that Ron very adequately expressed his concerns over the validity of the hets both in the sale price and by direct statement.
If all of the above is correct than I would say the only mistake here was in not hammering out the details of the guaranty up front. Blame is definitely shared there. Given the fact that everything was disclosed up front and taking into account the heavily discounted price, my opinion is that a reasonable remedy would be to give you a choice of a return of the animals and a 150% refund for your trouble or, you keep the now breedable females and he returns 1/2 of the purchase price. In the first option you have been compensated for the time and funds you have put into the animals and Ron recoups some of the refund by selling the females at market as normals. In the second instance, you are also compensated for your time and get to retain the now breedable females for your own use or resale.
Al, this in no way means that I do not think you have every right and cause to be pissed and frustrated by the situation but to automatically expect him to take a bigger hit than the purchase price here, given the situation, seems a bit over the top. If you had paid market price for the animals at the time and been asured that they were 100% without a shred of doubt, it would be an entirely different story. In this instance you took a chance on heavily discounted animals that had honest doubt cast on them prior to consumating the deal. In this instance, it didn't pay off.
Strictly my opinion