Well, this clearly shows that in fact Star Reptiles sent verifiable e-mails with the typical header info appearing, however, the same can't be said for texas_beardie's-(aka: godsmack000's) replies. Embedded individual e-mails within a string of back & forth replies between parties will typically contain something similar to the following:
From: Joe Smith <
up_a_creek@without_a_paddle.net>
Date: 1/22/2004 7:39:56 PM
To: Jane Doe <worried_the@chits_gettin'_deep.net>
Subject: Re: Hypothetical Reptile Transaction
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Joe
-------Original Message-------
From: Jane Doe <
worried_the@chits_gettin_deep.net>
To: Joe Smith <
up_a_creek@without_a_paddle.net>
Sent: 1/22/2004 12:29:10 PM
Subject: Hypothetical Reptile Transaction
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Jane
I just don't see anything that makes Star Reptiles a "bad guy" or "rip off" as the original post states. I am still not taking sides, just pointing out a rather obvious fact. The screen captures as shown only show Star Reptile's header info, and the embedded portions from either party
could have been added or edited. Nothing of a revealing factual nature thus far that I can see.
At this point, I personally would think that a scanned copy of the alleged refund check issued, or a copy of a signature receipt for same, would help to put this thread to rest.