USARK Action Alert: HR2683 Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act - FaunaClassifieds
FaunaClassifieds  
 Sponsors »  Breeders | Dealers |  Importers/Exporters | Caging | Feed | Supplies | Services | Events 
  Inside FaunaClassifieds » Product Reviews |  Classifieds!   | Photo Gallery   | Banner Advertising 
 
  Do you want to be able to bump and highlight your classified ads? Click here!

Go Back   FaunaClassifieds > Laws, Legislative Issues & Alerts > General Legislative Discussions

Notices

General Legislative Discussions Any general discussion concerning legislative issues or events. Not necessarily specific to a particular region, or even a type of animal group.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2019, 12:06 AM   #1
bcr229
USARK Action Alert: HR2683 Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act

https://usark.org/2019-blog/federal-teapspa/

ACTION ALERT: Federal Animal Program Ban

By USARK on June 8, 2019

HR2863 has been introduced as the "Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act’’ (or TEAPSPA). This bill is a broad-sweeping ban on “traveling animal acts” authored by radical animal rights groups. These animal rights extremists will have again fed the legislators their misinformation and false propaganda and misinformation so we must do our job to educate legislators properly. The text has been posted following a press release about the bill over two weeks ago. This bill has been introduced previously (more than once) and has not passed.

Very basic summary:
1.Ban on all "exotic or wild animals" being transported and then viewed by any audience;
2."Exotic or wild animals" means any animal not widely accepted as a domesticated pet (i.e. domesticated dogs and cats) or domesticated farm animal (i.e. horses, cattle, swine, etc);
3.Affected species are identified through the broad and vague definition of "exotic or wild" which, as defined in this bill, is any species not widely recognized as domesticated;
4.The species list uses the words "including but not limited to." That means the law would be all-encompassing and not limited to the species directly listed in the bill;
5.The definition of "performance" is overly broad and includes any presentation, program, or exhibit which benefits an audience. Education can certainly be included as a benefit;
6.The only exemptions apply to programs in which the animal is not transported at a "non-mobile, permanent institution, zoo, or aquarium" which is accredited by one of three entities (AZA, WAZA, or GFAS) or one of few other specific exceptions;
7.Any person in violation will face penalties provided in the Animal Welfare Act;
8.This bill is not about elephant abuse or tigers jumping through fiery hoops. This bill bans school talks about tortoises and presentations at Scout meetings about snakes.

Please know that this bill and its introduction were written by a radical animal rights group and not by a member of Congress. The bill introduction text is littered with misinformation and falsehoods. It was clearly written to mislead the reader about exactly who this bill will impact.

The introductory "Findings" section of this bill utters absurd lies about the animal educators who will be affected. It claims that conditions of abuse are inherent to traveling performances of all kinds and that there are no responsible animal educators. The bill instead implies that every person who gives traveling presentations with animals is an animal abuser.

Below are just three examples of the fallacies presented in TEAPSPA:

Lie: "exotic and wild animals are forced to perform unnatural tricks requiring extreme physical coercion, including, but not limited to the use of food and water restrictions, electric shock devices, bull-hooks, metal bars, whips, shovels, and pitchforks, among other abuses." at Section 2. Findings (8)

Correction: That is complete and utter absurdity! Animal educators are not torturing their animals as stated in this bill. Also, this type of animal abuse is already punishable by current law (by multiple levels of government).

Additionally, we are quite uncertain how a tortoise walking across a room or a gecko sitting in a presenter's hand can be considered "unnatural tricks requiring extreme physical coercion."

Lie: “conditions inherent to traveling performances, including constant travel, temporary and collapsible facilities, and the prolonged confinement and physical coercion of animals, subject exotic and wild animals to compromised welfare and chronic stress, and present public and worker health and safety risks not adequately addressed by current regulation” at Section 2. Findings (1)

Correction: Animals used in animal outreach programs and other presentations are not subjected to "constant travel." Other claims made here label every animal educator as an animal abuser yet again.

Lie: Displaying animals in educational outreach programs "...undermines conservation efforts necessary to protect threatened and endangered species." at Section 2. Findings (10)

Correction: The lies in this bill are extensive, and sadly that is only directly apparent to people who work with exotic animals. Can sparking interests in endangered species by providing in-person education about habitat loss and consumption as traditional foods and medicines undermine conservation efforts? Quite to the contrary, these programs encourage conservation in many ways.

The lies go on and on in this animal rights propaganda hit piece.

Similar animal performance and traveling animal act bans have been and are still being proposed across the country at local and state levels. Full disclosure is never provided by proponents as to the extent of the impact and consequences of the bill. Typically these bills are pitched to legislators as a way to end any animal abuse that may be occurring at small circuses and roadside animal shows.

Legitimate animal welfare laws already exist to address any issues of cruelty or neglect. These animal rights bills are superfluous schemes that primarily serve to further the reach of the radical animal rights groups promoting them, feeding their industry on legislative clout, and incrementally removing animals from our lives. Existing laws should be enforced; repetitive overlapping legislation proposals do nothing to aid enforcement, and merely waste taxpayer money, by allowing legislators the veil to seem busy with "work" rather than addressing the hard issues.

This bill bans much more than lions jumping through rings of fire. It is a ban on taking a Greek tortoise into a classroom for an educational program about reptiles. It is a ban on taking a ball python, a red-eyed tree frog, a parakeet, and a hedgehog into a library for an educational show discussing the differences between reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals. It is a ban on many non-traditional livestock species at the State Fair or county 4-H fairs.

Basically, if an animal that is not widely considered domesticated is placed into a vehicle and taken to any location where it will be shown to someone other than a veterinarian in a private room, then it would become an illegal activity, and you a criminal. You could be a federal criminal for taking a leopard gecko into a school classroom for a presentation.

While the examples we provide may not be seen in the direct language of the law, the law could certainly be interpreted to include them. Any enforcement officer could apply this law to commonplace educational outreach programs that include exotic animals. "Performance" and "wild and exotic animal" are so broadly defined that the law can include any type of program and most animal species.

In addition to the overt fabrications in the introductory “Findings” section, this bill lacks basic legislative research. For instance, the bill states:

This Act shall not be interpreted to- authorize the interstate transport of a threatened or endangered species, which is prohibited under the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 5 1538)

Contrary to this statement, the interstate transport of species listed under the Endangered Species Act is not prohibited. It is only interstate sales which are prohibited without a permit. The bill authors are not concerned about such details; this bill is written to further extreme animal rights ideals and to limit opportunities for human-animal interactions. This bill is not about animal welfare.

The bill sponsor is democrat and co-sponsors include 22 democrats and 1 republican. The has not yet been heard or assigned to a committee.

You can read the bill text at www.usark.org/2019-teapspa-hr2863.

Sample Messaging
(Three sample letters and also Talking Points)

Voice your opposition and educate legislators now!
TAKE ACTION by doing one or, preferably, all of the below.
Remember to be civil and professional at all times.
1.Fax letters to Representatives’ offices;
2.Mail letters to Representatives’ offices;
3.Send emails to Representatives’ offices;
4.Make phone calls to Representatives’ offices.

How to contact your federal Representative: www.house.gov/representatives/find

Sample Letter Headings or Email Subject Lines
1.NO to HR2683
2.STOP HR2683
3.HR2683: TEAPSPA is Unjust
4.HR2683 Opposition
5.STOP TEAPSPA

Sample Letters/Emails
Please edit and personalize the sample letters.

Sample Letter 1

Dear U.S. Representative,

I implore you to stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. As a dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I ask you to realize that this bill is redundant, misleading, and a complete waste of taxpayers' money and government resources.

This bill is far-reaching and rife with unintended consequences, including making criminals out of those dedicated individuals who responsibly conduct educational programs with animals. Proponents for this bill have a radical agenda and should not be confused with people who are legitimately concerned for animal welfare. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal educators by saying NO to HR2683! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]

Sample Letter 2

Dear U.S. Representative,

As a dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I implore you to stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. The United States already has extensive animal welfare and anti-cruelty laws. Enforce those current laws! Please realize that this bill is redundant, and a waste of taxpayers' money and your time as a member of Congress.

Among other overreaching measures, this bill bans many educational outreach programs before students and Scout troops, classifying such beneficial programs as inherently cruel Those who would travel with their animals to teach school children about tortoises and exotic birds will be made into criminals!

The fact is that this legislation is unnecessary. HR2683 would be just another unnecessary law! Punish the "bad actors" and the criminals. No new law is needed to protect animals.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal educators by stopping HR2683! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]

Sample Letter 3 (great to use when faxing or mailing)

Re: Opposition to HR2683, the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act" (TEAPSPA)

Dear U.S. Representative,

You must stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. As an American citizen and dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I am informing you that this bill is bad government policy and it is bad for the people and animals in U.S. Similar legislation is being introduced at various levels across the U.S. However, this bill goes far beyond others, declaring that traveling with animals is inherently cruel, and demonizing legitimate animal educators whose programs will qualify as “traveling animal acts.”

I am a fierce advocate of responsible animal ownership. It is unreasonable to punish those engaging in conscientious animal husbandry and outreach with such a misguided attempt to crack down upon those who are negligent. This bill is redundant and a waste of U.S. taxpayers' money and Congressional resources.

Allow me to emphasize two of the major problems with HR2683:
1.The overreach and unintended consequences are immense! The overly broad definition of “performance” would ban educational talks with a Greek tortoise at a school or library, for example.
2.This bill would become just another unnecessary and superfluous law! Animal welfare and anti-cruelty laws already exist.

Please take heed and be cognizant of the unintended consequences of this bill. HR2683 infringes on the rights and freedoms of responsible animal owners who provide education regarding their animals to tens of thousands of U.S. residents annually. Now those citizens will be considered federal criminals for activities that educate and enhance their communities.

Such educational animal outreach events allow children to actually see animals in person. There are many ways to learn about animals, but seeing them in person leads to much greater appreciation, and fuels the desire to learn and to conserve animals and their habitats. This is an important benefit which is not cruel to the animals involved.

Do not lump the credible services provided by educators into the same category as acts of animal cruelty. The obscenity of this bill is staggering. Who would imagine that taking a tortoise, parrot, ferret, sugar glider, or any commonly kept pet animal – that may not be widely considered a “domestic animal” – to a school for an educational seminar would be a crime? You will be making criminals out of people who just want to share their understanding of, and joy in their animals.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal owners and educators by stopping HR2683 before it gets going. NO to TEAPSPA! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]



Talking Points
1.The United States already has animal welfare laws, including the Animal Welfare Act. Enforce those laws!
2.If someone is irresponsible with an animal in America, they can be punished under existing laws at multiple levels of government.
3.This bill would make illegal the thousands of beneficial, educational outreach programs performed each year by responsible animal keepers.
4.The definitions used in this bill turn upstanding citizens into criminals.
5.The very programs that inspire and set forth the paths for tomorrow's conservationists, veterinarians, and biologists will be banned!
6.It is unreasonable to punish those conducting responsible education programs with such a misguided attempt to crack down upon actual animal cruelty.
7.Books and videos are great, but actually seeing animals leads to much greater appreciation and fuels the desire to learn, and to conserve animals and their habitats.
8.Prohibitions such as this proposed ban demonstrate an irrational approach over common sense.
9.Collective punishment (punishment of everyone due to the actions of one or a few) is never a good government practice.
10.This bill is yet another solution in search of a problem.
11.This will be nothing but another superfluous and selectively enforced law which will punish responsible citizens while criminals will go unpunished.
12.The bill will yield scores of unintended consequences.
13.Why would someone who educates a classroom about reptiles or brings a hedgehog to a Scout troop meeting be expected to know about this law? Even worse, such a person will unwittingly become a criminal merely for educating others about animals!

Finally and frankly, the bill sponsors should be ashamed (and penalized) for allowing their names to be attached to such complete falsehoods. These are members of Congress spreading falsities and deceiving American citizens. Deceitful animal rights bills such as this make a mockery of our government. Legislators who fall for this disinformation without verifying the statements made should be removed from office immediately.

The facade created by the animal rights movement continues to tug at heartstrings through misleading propaganda. Creating an image misunderstood by the general public allows them to make hundreds of millions of dollars annually by profiting from these animals. Profits do not go to the animals but they do go to overpaid executives, offshore bank accounts, lobbying efforts, and self-promotion.
 
Old 07-02-2019, 11:22 PM   #2
ajgarcia83
Hell no I didnt know!!! ANYTHING TO GET THIS UNDONE????
 
Old 07-02-2019, 11:45 PM   #3
bcr229
This was only an introduced bill, it has not passed into law. It is fortunately languishing in committee at the moment.
 
Old 08-01-2019, 02:24 PM   #4
daviding19
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcr229 View Post
https://usark.org/2019-blog/federal-teapspa/

ACTION ALERT: Federal Animal Program Ban

By USARK on June 8, 2019

HR2863 has been introduced as the "Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act’’ (or TEAPSPA). This bill is a broad-sweeping ban on “traveling animal acts” authored by radical animal rights groups. These animal rights extremists will have again fed the legislators their misinformation and false propaganda and misinformation so we must do our job to educate legislators properly. The text has been posted following a press release about the bill over two weeks ago. This bill has been introduced previously (more than once) and has not passed.

Very basic summary:
1.Ban on all "exotic or wild animals" being transported and then viewed by any audience;
2."Exotic or wild animals" means any animal not widely accepted as a domesticated pet (i.e. domesticated dogs and cats) or domesticated farm animal (i.e. horses, cattle, swine, etc);
3.Affected species are identified through the broad and vague definition of "exotic or wild" which, as defined in this bill, is any species not widely recognized as domesticated;
4.The species list uses the words "including but not limited to." That means the law would be all-encompassing and not limited to the species directly listed in the bill;
5.The definition of "performance" is overly broad and includes any presentation, program, or exhibit which benefits an audience. Education can certainly be included as a benefit;
6.The only exemptions apply to programs in which the animal is not transported at a "non-mobile, permanent institution, zoo, or aquarium" which is accredited by one of three entities (AZA, WAZA, or GFAS) or one of few other specific exceptions;
7.Any person in violation will face penalties provided in the Animal Welfare Act;
8.This bill is not about elephant abuse or tigers jumping through fiery hoops. This bill bans school talks about tortoises and presentations at Scout meetings about snakes.

Please know that this bill and its introduction were written by a radical animal rights group and not by a member of Congress. The bill introduction text is littered with misinformation and falsehoods. It was clearly written to mislead the reader about exactly who this bill will impact.

The introductory "Findings" section of this bill utters absurd lies about the animal educators who will be affected. It claims that conditions of abuse are inherent to traveling performances of all kinds and that there are no responsible animal educators. The bill instead implies that every person who gives traveling presentations with animals is an animal abuser.

Below are just three examples of the fallacies presented in TEAPSPA:

Lie: "exotic and wild animals are forced to perform unnatural tricks requiring extreme physical coercion, including, but not limited to the use of food and water restrictions, electric shock devices, bull-hooks, metal bars, whips, shovels, and pitchforks, among other abuses." at Section 2. Findings (8)

Correction: That is complete and utter absurdity! Animal educators are not torturing their animals as stated in this bill. Also, this type of animal abuse is already punishable by current law (by multiple levels of government).

Additionally, we are quite uncertain how a tortoise walking across a room or a gecko sitting in a presenter's hand can be considered "unnatural tricks requiring extreme physical coercion."

Lie: “conditions inherent to traveling performances, including constant travel, temporary and collapsible facilities, and the prolonged confinement and physical coercion of animals, subject exotic and wild animals to compromised welfare and chronic stress, and present public and worker health and safety risks not adequately addressed by current regulation” at Section 2. Findings (1)

Correction: Animals used in animal outreach programs and other presentations are not subjected to "constant travel." Other claims made here label every animal educator as an animal abuser yet again.

Lie: Displaying animals in educational outreach programs "...undermines conservation efforts necessary to protect threatened and endangered species." at Section 2. Findings (10)

Correction: The lies in this bill are extensive, and sadly that is only directly apparent to people who work with exotic animals. Can sparking interests in endangered species by providing in-person education about habitat loss and consumption as traditional foods and medicines undermine conservation efforts? Quite to the contrary, these programs encourage conservation in many ways.

The lies go on and on in this animal rights propaganda hit piece.

Similar animal performance and traveling animal act bans have been and are still being proposed across the country at local and state levels. Full disclosure is never provided by proponents as to the extent of the impact and consequences of the bill. Typically these bills are pitched to legislators as a way to end any animal abuse that may be occurring at small circuses and roadside animal shows.

Legitimate animal welfare laws already exist to address any issues of cruelty or neglect. These animal rights bills are superfluous schemes that primarily serve to further the reach of the radical animal rights groups promoting them, feeding their industry on legislative clout, and incrementally removing animals from our lives. Existing laws should be enforced; repetitive overlapping legislation proposals do nothing to aid enforcement, and merely waste taxpayer money, by allowing legislators the veil to seem busy with "work" rather than addressing the hard issues.

This bill bans much more than lions jumping through rings of fire. It is a ban on taking a Greek tortoise into a classroom for an educational program about reptiles. It is a ban on taking a ball python, a red-eyed tree frog, a parakeet, and a hedgehog into a library for an educational show discussing the differences between reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals. It is a ban on many non-traditional livestock species at the State Fair or county 4-H fairs.

Basically, if an animal that is not widely considered domesticated is placed into a vehicle and taken to any location where it will be shown to someone other than a veterinarian in a private room, then it would become an illegal activity, and you a criminal. You could be a federal criminal for taking a leopard gecko into a school classroom for a presentation.

While the examples we provide may not be seen in the direct language of the law, the law could certainly be interpreted to include them. Any enforcement officer could apply this law to commonplace educational outreach programs that include exotic animals. "Performance" and "wild and exotic animal" are so broadly defined that the law can include any type of program and most animal species.

In addition to the overt fabrications in the introductory “Findings” section, this bill lacks basic legislative research. For instance, the bill states:

This Act shall not be interpreted to- authorize the interstate transport of a threatened or endangered species, which is prohibited under the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 5 1538)

Contrary to this statement, the interstate transport of species listed under the Endangered Species Act is not prohibited. It is only interstate sales which are prohibited without a permit. The bill authors are not concerned about such details; this bill is written to further extreme animal rights ideals and to limit opportunities for human-animal interactions. This bill is not about animal welfare.

The bill sponsor is democrat and co-sponsors include 22 democrats and 1 republican. The has not yet been heard or assigned to a committee.

You can read the bill text at www.usark.org/2019-teapspa-hr2863.

Sample Messaging
(Three sample letters and also Talking Points)

Voice your opposition and educate legislators now!
TAKE ACTION by doing one or, preferably, all of the below.
Remember to be civil and professional at all times.
1.Fax letters to Representatives’ offices;
2.Mail letters to Representatives’ offices;
3.Send emails to Representatives’ offices;
4.Make phone calls to Representatives’ offices.

How to contact your federal Representative: www.house.gov/representatives/find

Sample Letter Headings or Email Subject Lines
1.NO to HR2683
2.STOP HR2683
3.HR2683: TEAPSPA is Unjust
4.HR2683 Opposition
5.STOP TEAPSPA

Sample Letters/Emails
Please edit and personalize the sample letters.

Sample Letter 1

Dear U.S. Representative,

I implore you to stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. As a dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I ask you to realize that this bill is redundant, misleading, and a complete waste of taxpayers' money and government resources.

This bill is far-reaching and rife with unintended consequences, including making criminals out of those dedicated individuals who responsibly conduct educational programs with animals. Proponents for this bill have a radical agenda and should not be confused with people who are legitimately concerned for animal welfare. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal educators by saying NO to HR2683! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]

Sample Letter 2

Dear U.S. Representative,

As a dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I implore you to stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. The United States already has extensive animal welfare and anti-cruelty laws. Enforce those current laws! Please realize that this bill is redundant, and a waste of taxpayers' money and your time as a member of Congress.

Among other overreaching measures, this bill bans many educational outreach programs before students and Scout troops, classifying such beneficial programs as inherently cruel Those who would travel with their animals to teach school children about tortoises and exotic birds will be made into criminals!

The fact is that this legislation is unnecessary. HR2683 would be just another unnecessary law! Punish the "bad actors" and the criminals. No new law is needed to protect animals.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal educators by stopping HR2683! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]

Sample Letter 3 (great to use when faxing or mailing)

Re: Opposition to HR2683, the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act" (TEAPSPA)

Dear U.S. Representative,

You must stop HR2683 titled the "‘Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act," or TEAPSPA. As an American citizen and dedicated advocate for animal welfare, I am informing you that this bill is bad government policy and it is bad for the people and animals in U.S. Similar legislation is being introduced at various levels across the U.S. However, this bill goes far beyond others, declaring that traveling with animals is inherently cruel, and demonizing legitimate animal educators whose programs will qualify as “traveling animal acts.”

I am a fierce advocate of responsible animal ownership. It is unreasonable to punish those engaging in conscientious animal husbandry and outreach with such a misguided attempt to crack down upon those who are negligent. This bill is redundant and a waste of U.S. taxpayers' money and Congressional resources.

Allow me to emphasize two of the major problems with HR2683:
1.The overreach and unintended consequences are immense! The overly broad definition of “performance” would ban educational talks with a Greek tortoise at a school or library, for example.
2.This bill would become just another unnecessary and superfluous law! Animal welfare and anti-cruelty laws already exist.

Please take heed and be cognizant of the unintended consequences of this bill. HR2683 infringes on the rights and freedoms of responsible animal owners who provide education regarding their animals to tens of thousands of U.S. residents annually. Now those citizens will be considered federal criminals for activities that educate and enhance their communities.

Such educational animal outreach events allow children to actually see animals in person. There are many ways to learn about animals, but seeing them in person leads to much greater appreciation, and fuels the desire to learn and to conserve animals and their habitats. This is an important benefit which is not cruel to the animals involved.

Do not lump the credible services provided by educators into the same category as acts of animal cruelty. The obscenity of this bill is staggering. Who would imagine that taking a tortoise, parrot, ferret, sugar glider, or any commonly kept pet animal – that may not be widely considered a “domestic animal” – to a school for an educational seminar would be a crime? You will be making criminals out of people who just want to share their understanding of, and joy in their animals.

Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Hopefully, you will do what is right for America, the animals, and responsible animal owners and educators by stopping HR2683 before it gets going. NO to TEAPSPA! Have a good day.

Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME HERE]



Talking Points
1.The United States already has animal welfare laws, including the Animal Welfare Act. Enforce those laws!
2.If someone is irresponsible with an animal in America, they can be punished under existing laws at multiple levels of government.
3.This bill would make illegal the thousands of beneficial, educational outreach programs performed each year by responsible animal keepers.
4.The definitions used in this bill turn upstanding citizens into criminals.
5.The very programs that inspire and set forth the paths for tomorrow's conservationists, veterinarians, and biologists will be banned!
6.It is unreasonable to punish those conducting responsible education programs with such a misguided attempt to crack down upon actual animal cruelty.
7.Books and videos are great, but actually seeing animals leads to much greater appreciation and fuels the desire to learn, and to conserve animals and their habitats.
8.Prohibitions such as this proposed ban demonstrate an irrational approach over common sense.
9.Collective punishment (punishment of everyone due to the actions of one or a few) is never a good government practice.
10.This bill is yet another solution in search of a problem.
11.This will be nothing but another superfluous and selectively enforced law which will punish responsible citizens while criminals will go unpunished.
12.The bill will yield scores of unintended consequences.
13.Why would someone who educates a classroom about reptiles or brings a hedgehog to a Scout troop meeting be expected to know about this law? Even worse, such a person will unwittingly become a criminal merely for educating others about animals!

Finally and frankly, the bill sponsors should be ashamed (and penalized) for allowing their names to be attached to such complete falsehoods. These are members of Congress spreading falsities and deceiving American citizens. Deceitful animal rights bills such as this make a mockery of our government. Legislators who fall for this disinformation without verifying the statements made should be removed from office immediately.

The facade created by the animal rights movement continues to tug at heartstrings through misleading propaganda. Creating an image misunderstood by the general public allows them to make hundreds of millions of dollars annually by profiting from these animals. Profits do not go to the animals but they do go to overpaid executives, offshore bank accounts, lobbying efforts, and self-promotion.
well said!
 
Old 08-01-2019, 02:37 PM   #5
WebSlave
Quote:
Originally Posted by daviding19 View Post
well said!
It is good to see that spammers from the Philippines are taking such an interest in this.
 

Join now to reply to this thread or open new ones for your questions & comments! FaunaClassifieds.com is the largest online community about Reptile & Amphibians, Snakes, Lizards and number one classifieds service with thousands of ads to look for. Registration is open to everyone and FREE. Click Here to Register!

 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clark County Nevada ACTION ALERT Arachno General Legislative Discussions 8 12-10-2015 08:24 PM
USARK Legal Action Against FWS Constrictor Rule EricWI General Legislative Discussions 68 01-05-2013 06:43 PM
OHIO ACTION ALERT EricWI General Legislative Discussions 0 05-11-2012 08:12 PM
USARK Board Meeting Open to Public USARK.Jonathan.Brady General Legislative Discussions 0 08-18-2011 06:50 PM
USARK Public Comment/ 30 Day Extension USARK.Jonathan.Brady General Legislative Discussions 6 05-19-2010 09:32 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 AM.







TESTING!
Fauna Top Sites


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.11298609 seconds with 12 queries
Content copyrighted ©2002-2018, FaunaClassifieds, LLC