Normally I don't pay take the time to read a "Good Guy" thread as I expect it to be the normal well-earned patronizing expressed by customers to vendors. Since this one hung-around, and gained posts more quickly than usual "Good Guy" threads, it was obvious something wasn't right.
Greg, it is clear that your situation was unfortunate, an did not meet your expectations. Without getting into the details which I do not know, unless stated in writing prior to the deal, I think you have some expectation of a health guarantee, in this case not that the animal was a healthy feeder, but not that it was on death's doorstep either. As Ben mentioned, he had no inkling of this when he shipped it, and there's no reason not to believe him. There is every reason to believe him. Regardless, unless stated otherwise, you should have had an expectation that it would be healthy enough for you to work with a bit, and it was not, to no one's fault, but to Ben's responsibility. Ben has made an offer of compensation, and all indications are that he is quite good for it. I think there could have been better communications of the parameters of purchase by both parties, but hindsight is 20-20.
The main reason for my post is this, a quote from you Greg stated twice in separate posts:
Quote:
I am not saying that he is a bad guy
|
Too coy for me. There's many different ways to read your posts, and both overtly and by omission, your words painted Ben as a "Bad Guy" in his dealings with you in all variations. While you may be correct in a "Clintonesque" way, that you did not state it directly, you painted with a "bad guy" brush in no unmistakable terms. You have right to be upset, although it doesn't make Ben to blame. But as you wanted Ben to take more responsibility for the demise of the animal, at least take ownership for your own words here as well. Ben is top notch proven over and over, just not perfect ....... yet