Shrillomn, a brief expose

Wes stop stuffing the tights, the basketball is a little over the top.

Originally Posted by Otter_23

Wes stop stuffing the tights, the basketball is a little over the top.

Maybe you're right, but the volleyball just didn't seem adequate.

Originally Posted by Wilomn

Maybe you're right, but the volleyball just didn't seem adequate.

Yeah, especially when you have friends like me that would "spike" that bad boy!

LOL Ouch

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company

Robinhood ? A little bit of a stretch ? Ebenezer Scrooge is less of a stretch. How about Caligula? Wes, it doesn't take much talent or experience to identify the "bad guys", as many have shown the ability to do it in short order. As discussed here in this thread, and demonstrated in several other threads almost every week, it is your inability to restrain yourself from rushing to insult those who many of us do not feel are bad, or have been unethical, or where at least further explanations are warranted. To be quick to label many that way, and then claim kudos for being right some of the time, is also to ignore the many times that you are wrong. Maybe its an Oedipus Complex, but the above self-flagellating manifesto is one more example of a point-of-view that defines your shallowness.

Maybe we should take a step back and look at the big picture. Wes used to have some good stuff to say but here lately many people have noticed he is quick with the insult and doesn't seem to have much self restraint.

Wes sent me some bad karma today, and a message to go with it. I would like to show it here, in its entirety:

Originally Posted by Willomn

you ain't all that, no chips for sure. it's NOT all about YOU, thank goodness. Back to dandy you go, keep the phone warm

That's it. I have added nothing and taken nothing away.

When I read it, it seemed disjointed and incoherent. It is vaguely insulting, but mostly it just doesn't make sense, as if the writer was impaired.

Perhaps, rather than taking an adversarial stance, we should offer Wes some help. The old Wes could be a bit of a card at times, but I don't remember anything like this.

Originally Posted by lucille

Wes sent me some bad karma today, and a message to go with it. I would like to show it here, in its entirety:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Willomn

you ain't all that, no chips for sure. it's NOT all about YOU, thank goodness. Back to dandy you go, keep the phone warm


That's it. I have added nothing and taken nothing away.

When I read it, it seemed disjointed and incoherent. It is vaguely insulting, but mostly it just doesn't make sense, as if the writer was impaired.

Perhaps, rather than taking an adversarial stance, we should offer Wes some help. The old Wes could be a bit of a card at times, but I don't remember anything like this.

I rarely ever give out bad karma. Could you please share the post with us that the negative karma was given?

Sorry to butcher your post like that, but, I wanted to stick to the negative karma part.

Lucille,
I get the same balogna in the bad-karma snipes that Wes gives me as well. While comments are expected, with Wes its as if you are hearing from a crying child who did not get his way, as they are petty and pathetic. Thanks for the cut-and-paste. You can do so anytime.

Laura, I will wager a guess. But yesterday in a thread Lucille made an innocent and quite non-offensice post about some reptiles shipped poorly, with mites etc. Wes' retort to her post was the same BS. Out of the blue sniping by the little rooster again. Cock-a-doodle-poo.

Again, just guessing, but it stands as one more example of Wes. Check posts 27-28, by Lucile and then Wes, in the Jason Whitecotton thread in the BOI. Hopefully Lucille will be able to follow-up here in due time.

Here:

http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/foru...245#post459245


Yeah, it was a little ballsy But the note from Wes is incoherent .

Bingo !