Beware of Jeane Best & Wendy Childs

Jim seems to judge people before even getting to know them , I have a grandmother that is that way. The only thing I told Miss Wendy to watch her back for is that I'm sending the Washington State Animal Health Inspector to her house to investigate the shape her animals are in .She has posted in auction a few geckos that looked to me to be a little under the weather and infested with internal parasites. But that has nothing to do with this thread. This thread has to do with a shipping and delivery problem and
makes no difference to me who's names are involved. It could have been Alex Hue and Ron Tremper with the same argument and I would still say don't refund the money , FIRST ATTEMPT WAS FAILED.

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company

Sammy,
I guess you know what went down there, eh? Hmmmmmmmm.......

No Jim, only you know everything.

Sammy, we agree. I thank you for couching your "may" have, as that is an very honest reply. My impression of you is that you would "not" have, but I admit that is only an educated opinion at best.

Dennis, my first post was all about asking Erik questions. I guess he works nights. I was disappointed by his post, as it is clear I viewed it as hasty and not likely to help any matter along. I have no idea if Wendy will post here, although I shot her a quick email question when I first saw it. I was and am very disappointed by some of the other posts that followed it.

You may also note that I have nothing polite to say about "Timmy". If you didn't follow the Erik Weber thread, Timmy is committing criminal harassment against Wendy and her Mother. I heard the tapes, and provided a reference to the Spokane police today, also referring them to the thread. My quotes of Timmy are accurate from the thread. His ex-wife and kids are in another state. He is in Minnesota. He bragged about how he continues to threaten her, and that Wendy needs to be just as worried. I doubt that Erik in Colorado (not the Erik in the Erik Weber thread) had a clue that criminal harassment against Wendy and her Mother grew out of a thread here a few days ago, and is still continuing. Sorry, but what some of you see as "important" here just doesn't get there for me, while other situations are beyond the pale.

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company

Sammy, we agree. I thank you for couching your "may" have, as that is an very honest reply. My impression of you is that you would "not" have, but I admit that is only an educated opinion at best.

Well Jim, depending on how far out in left field the hypothetical buyer was I may have started a thread. It would really depend on the individual case.

Yeah Jim we both seem to be disappointed in some posts on this thread. I will quit busting your chops though. We both know neither one of us are going to change our position on this particular matter.

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company

You may also note that I have nothing polite to say about "Timmy". If you didn't follow the Erik Weber thread, Timmy is committing criminal harassment against Wendy and her Mother. I heard the tapes, and provided a reference to the Spokane police today, also referring them to the thread. My quotes of Timmy are accurate from the thread. His ex-wife and kids are in another state. He is in Minnesota. He bragged about how he continues to threaten her, and that Wendy needs to be just as worried. I doubt that Erik in Colorado (not the Erik in the Erik Weber thread) had a clue that criminal harassment against Wendy and her Mother grew out of a thread here a few days ago, and is still continuing. Sorry, but what some of you see as "important" here just doesn't get there for me, while other situations are beyond the pale.

I have heard the recordings that Wendy sent out and have followed the thread.
I'm just trying to understand why Wendy and her mother are having so much conflict. I haven’t seen a positive thread yet.

I am wondering a thing.

Maybe some of you who obviously know so much more than others about so many things will be able to be of assistance to me in this wonderment I have.

Why is it important that YOU all know why everyone does everything? Why is it that YOU need to approve what other do in order for them to have validity?

Who put you all in charge?

Just wondering why all the holier than thou was here.

I SUPPOSE looking at the facts, HA, like the setup about the driver, would be amiss. I suppose even considering that a guy who says in his TOS if you're not home on the first attempt, there IS no guarentee, actually MEANS if you are NOT home on the first attempt there is NO guarentee, no I suppose there is no point in considering that.

And I suppose there is also no point in considering the fact that someone could NOT provide photographic evidence about a claimed death, even though it was KNOWN that such evidenc would be required if a claim was made.

I suppose all that is really of no concern here. After all, this IS about how to get your thread approved, isn't it? It really has NOTHING to do with what looks like a theif being busted.

Does it?

I wonder.

No Jim, only you know everything.

Sometimes I take the time to read the details of the prior posts before I write

Sammy, UPS is my main carrier. I stick with them here because my local guy is the best. In fact, he's perfect. Makes my shipping life a cake-walk. I dropped DHL because the local guy couldn't tie his own shoes. Without going into detail, my local DHL blew deliveries to me that the UPS guy could do blindfolded. DHL found ways to "ruin a wet dream", all due to the delivery guy. Sammy, I respect your views often enough. But there are a few areas where, like it or not, I have some experience. If I knew everything, would I be posting here ? LOL ... at myself.

There is certainly a time for pre-emptive strikes. I don't see anything in Erik's position that warranted it. Now I see a possible knock-down, drag-out blow-up, PayPal dispute, etc. We have jointly chastised others in the past for coming here with too much haste. That's still my take on this one.

Thank you Wes!!!

Glad to see I am not the only one picking up on some of these aspects.

Wes says:

Maybe some of you who obviously know so much more than others about so many things will be able to be of assistance to me in this wonderment I have.

and then ...

It really has NOTHING to do with what looks like a theif being busted.

Let's tip our hat to those that seem to know more than others . I thought Erik's point was that the TOS were void on the non-delivery. With insight, its now about a thief. Wes, you always knew so much more !

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company

Wes says:


and then ...


Let's tip our hat to those that seem to know more than others . I thought Erik's point was that the TOS were void on the non-delivery. With insight, its now about a thief. Wes, you always knew so much more !

It's good to see that the obvious does not always escape you.

Very good.