Beware of Jeffery Lockman/John Pennington

Stu should be posting the original emails shortly, I look forward to seeing them.

Again, the judging goes on with "you can not afford a defamation suit". I would hate to say that is simply not the case. All contacting anyone's employer does is add to it which really is childish. I'm being honest with everything and the admin can remove the post and when asked by someone to should as most do. I do not think you can say someone who has commented thus has more of a clue than I do on the legal aspect of things. If they did they would provide facts and not opinions. There are thousands of people with my name and your names so search anything you want.

Again with Stu should be posting original emails. What emails the one from some other person? The false ones he already posted? I would look forward to seeing something false as well. If someone would had contacted me when this was posted I would have responded with the correct emails.

Again, I can message Stu and apologize for the bad transaction over a fee (which I will gladly do because I have nothing against him at all from the transaction). What would that prove. A select few on here will continue to comment and make posts. I will however, not admit to using a different name or anything to that extent because I have not. My name is the same on here as anything else.

So when stu posts screen shots of the emails what then? You cant deny anything then. Will you finally come clean then and admit to your lies? Hopefully stu will be able to post them soon so this can all be cleared up.

All anyone on here has to do is review what posts the "select users" have posted on here. It clearly shows they involve themselves tirelessly with BOI arguments and drama and help moderate them. If that isn't a fact for legitimate people out there then I do not know what is.

If he posts real emails I sent from my email then yes I will believe whatever he posts.
You are saying he will post the same garbage that was posted years ago. Then no you are correct I will not admit to something I did not send.

Since there is some question regarding the legitimacy of the emails I would suggest that Stu post the full headers in addition to the text. Yes they can be spoofed if you know how, but I doubt either party did in this transaction.

first round of emails. the first one shows both names.

more emails