Beware of Jeffery Lockman/John Pennington

Originally Posted by cybernuclear

Most of what he posted in regards to email was clearly plagiarized.

I am curious to know what you mean by this. Please explain.

Feel free to post your full communication stream if you feel the one Stu presented was inaccurate somehow, too. Better than "recollection" for evaluation.

I do not have to prove anything to anyone. Typing from a phone is difficult enough and nothing needs to be grammatically correct. He tried to attack my credentials I never mentioned anything to him. I don't flaunt that at all so that attack can just be dropped.
His statements and emails are not valid so you can twist whatever you want to pass the time but address those questions to him as the emails are not from me.

I do not keep emails for that length of time. Again address the validity of the emails with him. I'm asking the same thing. Why create something that isn't there. My entire point of even responding to the thread.

The whole dad's Paypal account thing seemed odd/off to me, too.

I've emailed Stu, perhaps he can bring some light onto the situation.

The "dad's Paypal" has got me wondering too.

Also:

Originally Posted by cybernuclear

Typing from a phone is difficult enough and nothing needs to be grammatically correct.

While typos do happen, I'd like to think they would happen less so with someone who has a doctorate. Just, ya know, throwing that out there.

Originally Posted by cybernuclear

I do not have to prove anything to anyone. Typing from a phone is difficult enough and nothing needs to be grammatically correct. He tried to attack my credentials I never mentioned anything to him. I don't flaunt that at all so that attack can just be dropped.
His statements and emails are not valid so you can twist whatever you want to pass the time but address those questions to him as the emails are not from me.

You are certainly not proving anything to anyone here. Well, except for Stu's already shared account of things.

Do clearly explain how I am twisting anything. An unsupported and false assertion that I am twisting anything would be a lie. Telling lies would make you what sort of person in this situation?

I can ask you whatever I like whenever I please. The quality of a response or non-response tells its own story to readers.

Originally Posted by cybernuclear

I do not keep emails for that length of time. Again address the validity of the emails with him. I'm asking the same thing. Why create something that isn't there. My entire point of even responding to the thread.

Then it seems you have nothing but your unsupported word regarding any of your claims against Stu's claims being valid.

You still have failed to explain what was plagiarized. Are you not up to the task? Is it beyond your ability? Are you using a word you do not understand?

After reading the emails and the dads paypal the first thing that came to mind was this is a kid trying to pretend to be someone he isn't in an attempt to bully the seller into doing what he wants. I could be completely wrong but that was my first impression. The way he spoke in the emails and even now doesn't come across as someone as educated as he claims to be. I'm welcome to him proving us wrong but I don't see that happening.

My impression was a person posing as another, too.

I'm not sure why he is making false allegations regarding emails. The emails are not from me. I did not respond to argue or prove anything which is what most people strive to do on these threads. I have nothing to post from almost 4 years ago. If i had seen the post at that time it would be different. It was clearly not me that messaged Stu. I'm not saying he is lying in anyway about receiving those emails. I just know that is not my address or writing.