Notices |
Hello!
Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please note that the information requested during registration will be used to determine your legitimacy as a participant of this site. As such, any information you provide that is determined to be false, inaccurate, misleading, or highly suspicious will result in your registration being rejected. This is designed to try to discourage as much as possible those spammers and scammers that tend to plague sites of this nature, to the detriment of all the legitimate members trying to enjoy the features this site provides for them.
Of particular importance is the REQUIREMENT that you provide your REAL full name upon registering. Sorry, but this is not like other sites where anonymity is more the rule.
Also your TRUE location is important. If the location you enter in your profile field does not match the location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected. As such, I strongly urge registrants to avoid using a VPN service to register, as they are often used by spammers and scammers, and as such will be blocked when discovered when auditing new registrations.
Sorry about all these hoops to jump through, but I am quite serious about blocking spammers and scammers at the gate on this site and am doing the very best that I can to that effect. Trust me, I would rather be doing more interesting things with my time, and wouldn't be making this effort if I didn't think it was worthwhile.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 02:24 PM
|
#361
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey
The name Pogona is itself relatively new. Before Glen Storr of the Western Australian Museum assigned these lizards this name, in 1982, they were lumped into the genus Amphibolorus with a number of other Australian agamid species.
http://www.smuggled.com/pogona1.htm
|
Thank you, Jean.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 02:25 PM
|
#362
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saladragon
This concerns me even more than when I read in the middle of the night that Adenovirus had been found in a boa.
|
What I was wondering (as I only have experience with the EM method) was, is the collection of feces done at home? If so, isn't it highly possible that the contamination of the sample started there, therefore causing a positive result?
I've heard people wonder the same thing about the EM testings, collection causing a negative result.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 02:39 PM
|
#363
|
|
Hello
Hello,
Yeah, pretty bad! As if IBD isn't bad enough...
Tracie
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 02:43 PM
|
#364
|
|
Hello
Hello,
Yeah, Sherri, it is a huge possibility of the contamination being started at home with the samples, if they were not done properly, etc.
Tracie
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 02:52 PM
|
#365
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drache613
Hello,
Yeah, Sherri, it is a huge possibility of the contamination being started at home with the samples, if they were not done properly, etc.
Tracie
|
So, it's a huge possibility that we aren't even close to finding out if Adeno is in ALL bearded dragons?
With that being said, the update still had a lot of great info and it seemed we all were waiting anxiously for it to come out but now that it's out and it tells us that even though they think that a big number of dragons have it, to still test, this being ignored. There is nothing that says definitively that ALL dragons have it. Not even close.
So, we make the mistake of breeding without testing therefore spreading this virus even further and now we want to create a mutation that doesn't have scales?
Does this make sense? Isn't there other lucritive ways to make money out there? We have to pick on an exotic animal to make our house, car, boat payments?
It's not right.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 03:15 PM
|
#366
|
|
Hello
Hello,
Totally agree! Until everything is figured out with the Adeno & the % of the population that actually has it, etc, then, the best we have is it just test, NO questions asked. If you don't test, then you really have no idea & that isn't right either.
If a breeder is not going to take the responsibility of testing each one of their breeders, then, they need to stop breeding & quit adding to the adeno population. I mean, aren't dogs, cats, & horses that are pedigreed, all certified disease free at the time of purchase? Well, why can't dragons have some type of standard like that? They deserve that. We should not be continuing to breed without testing, it is that simple, & then in the meantime, trying to create a new morphs to add into the mix when we don't even know how things are going to play out with this particular species!
I honestly do not believe that ALL dragons have it, otherwise, there wouldn't be people's dragons that have tested negative. However, there are a good number of them that do because it has spread so much.
Tracie
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 05:33 PM
|
#367
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whiskersmom
What I was wondering (as I only have experience with the EM method) was, is the collection of feces done at home? If so, isn't it highly possible that the contamination of the sample started there, therefore causing a positive result?
I've heard people wonder the same thing about the EM testings, collection causing a negative result.
|
Okay. After speaking with someone who has completed PCR testing many times, this is my understanding of things.
Some labs require both a cloacal wash and a poo sample, some labs only require the poo sample. I'm sure there are other things, too, but these are all I was informed of.
If the lab you use only accepts submissions from the vet, and they require the both the poo sample and the cloacal wash, you bring the dragon and a recent poo sample from that dragon to the vet with you. You give the recent poo sample to the vet. The vet performs a cloacal wash or swab, along with anything else vets do.
If the lab you use will accept submissions from individuals (which it is also my understanding the University of Florida did until recently, and I'm not sure if this protocol has changed yet), you send in your poo sample.
It is also my understanding that the poo is not required to be frozen, as it is in EM fecals.
To me, this indicates that the potential exists for many false POSITIVES in the PCR testing, particularly if one wanted it to appear that there were more positives than what there really are.
I don't know...you decide.
|
|
|
07-11-2007, 06:55 PM
|
#368
|
|
sandi0906 on BD.org and i share the same vet.she had an appt with him last night and i asked her to say hi to him for me.well today we have pm'd back and forth a couple times discussing what dr sean had to say about her beardie and i also asked if she said hi for me and she said that he had a look on his face like"oh boy whats wrong with her beardie now!?".so i sent a pm back to her and asked her what he said,this was her pm back to me: "lol no he was just laughing he knows ur having so many different issues with jojo, i think hes intrigued by her to be honest. about his tail i dont know it could be why he wags it lol maybe he thinks its going to grow back lol but he said a good 2-3 inches was off it lol and stupid me when looking at others pictures i would always tell jack humm sandi has a short tail its not long like the others lol which also means sandi is older than i thought he was. and jojo is going to get the ^6<~~~ extra finger of hope lol on her next fecel . gosh i hope so i know she feels miserable on that crap. and because of jojo we discussed adeno and he believes its from inbreeding hes strongly believes that. we also talked bout the silkbacks and he feels as we do , he says thats setting up more deaths for beardies." just to clear things up i asked her permission to copy/paste her PM here and she said yes.she had no idea about this fauna thread (or "fauna" for that matter).i suppose she saw the thread on BD.org and decided to ask the vet about it.
|
|
|
07-22-2007, 08:05 PM
|
#369
|
|
It's been very quiet on this thread for almost 2 weeks now.The last thing discussed was a very interesting deal put on the table by Vickie.Denise,have you heard from the person you entrusted your test results with?
|
|
|
07-22-2007, 08:46 PM
|
#370
|
|
I too would like to hear more about Denise's results. It seems that it should be relatively simple to have them verified by an impartial party. I'm surprised that Denise has not yet stepped up to Vicky's challenge. If it were me, I'd have the freakin' test results posted everywhere possible so that the truth could be seen by all!
Jamie
|
|
|
Join
now to reply to this thread or open new ones
for your questions & comments! FaunaClassifieds.com
is the largest online community about Reptile
& Amphibians, Snakes, Lizards and number one
classifieds service with thousands of ads to look
for. Registration is open to everyone and FREE.
Click Here to Register!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.
|
|