Brandon Griffey

Originally Posted by ShadowAceD

Mods do not ban for disagreeing with their viewpoint or because a minority is against the majority.

Where did I suggest anything remotely close to that?

Originally Posted by ShadowAceD

Harald was not posting as a moderator. Had he been doing so, he would have stated it and the text would have been blue. He was posting as a Fauna member.

I'm aware of how it works thank you. It seems you missed the point of my post. That being: had any of us said the things he did(as we have been the last few days) the the emotional arguments of the reactionary would have countered with their tired montra; "it just don't happen in nine days".(as they have been consistently the last few days). Yet they see a mod post the same, and where are their quick retorts? His role in his post is irrelevant. The accuracy of the observation is solid and comical. Did you wake up on the wrong side of the bed today of what?

Sorry April. You posted as I was writing.

Sorry Diem, I completely missed his post and thought you were talking to me. I'm going to go away now, there's some crow that needs eating. April, I couldn't let that one hang out there like that. I bit it in public, I needed to handle it the same way.

So...where's that Vet Report?

patience is a vertue.

Originally Posted by Kevin S

patience is a vertue.

Trying to create one? Oh well, why should I be concerned about the length of time your name shines at the top of the forum with a BAD GUY tag?... carry on. Take your time.

sorry but its not my name, I thought in the video didn't the vet say the organs were being sent out to be examined closer?

Originally Posted by Kevin S

sorry but its not my name, I thought in the video didn't the vet say the organs were being sent out to be examined closer?

I know, you can pass him the message since you're speaking for him.

I don't even know that the video is a real vet. My eyesight isn't want it used to be, but what I could see didn't look like a laboratory to me, and did I see a name tag on the Vet's coat? .

What I am getting at is so quite a few untruths have been stated. I was interested to see if Lucille verified that those Vets actually did perform a necropsy...

and there's nothing actually linking THAT Vet report to THAT snake. I'm just SO jaded...

I speak for no one other than myself. Like you i have read this thread , and Im only stating what has already been said, nothing more nothing less.

I can agree to disagree with you, Im not even sure if Lucille could get info from the vet as doesnt a patient confidentialty exist?

Maybe you need to get your eyes check as you stated ..jk As Im reading the same thread as you are. To say that that isn't a vet or a veets office is really streching it.

Originally Posted by Kevin S

I speak for no one other than myself. Like you i have read this thread , and Im only stating what has already been said, nothing more nothing less.

I can agree to disagree with you, Im not even sure if Lucille could get info from the vet as doesnt a patient confidentialty exist?

Maybe you need to get your eyes check as you stated ..jk As Im reading the same thread as you are. To say that that isn't a vet or a veets office is really streching it.

Ah well, it's just a thought I had. It may play out, may not. Just a thought that passed though my mind after reading this thread and taking into consideration the lengths liars and scammers have been willing to go though lately.

I could be entirely wrong...