Where are they?

Jenn, what kind of ordinance? I would think if they could establish previous ownership, the ordinance might not apply to existing owners?

It would, but the catch is you can not get anymore. NO MATTER WHAT!!!!!
The ordanice is a ban on all snakes that would be longer than 6ft in length. Plus all hots. I think after our county board meeting on thursday it will not make it pass the second reading in two weeks. I posted a copy of the ordanice in the law section, but you'll have to dig to find it because it was early last month. (i think)

Here is a link http://accforum.proboards23.com/inde...num=1083291529
I had to find it on Ksshane's site, but here it is in all of its gorly.

I read the proposed ordinance and then what everyone had to say; I do think you are right, that careful attention to what is going on is the only way to stop ordinances of this nature. Although I do in fact think there may be some validity to local city ordinances against big animals such as tigers and elephants, unless licensed.

I completely agree that some thing should be in place. I just don't think it should be done on ignorence(sp?) I mean a tiger should NOT be living in someones living room. But if they had permit to have it out on a farm or something like that. Plus most of the animals listed are already governed by the fed gov.
They would have to pry my boa out of my dead cold hands before i gave her up! After all she IS one of my kids.

i have kept my big momma colombian boa, dark brown an red coloring mostly since she was a little over 2 years old and shes about 9 at the moment, as long as ive kept her and as many trials and tribulations as weve been through together i would keep her even though shes nothing really special as far as genes are concerned over any of the stripers or albinos or anerys or salmons that i currently have too
i am VERY partial to my big momma snake (Ruby) so i dont think ANY kind of ordinance would make me give her up without a fight