Quote:
You said the chances would be better when crossing a patternless het albino with an albino het patternless. First of all, while it makes sense, I didn't know that it mattered.
|
Well, what I said was, your odds for producing a patternless albino increase when breeding visual morphs het for the other trait (albino het patternless, patternless het albino) rather than breeding two double hets together. Your statistics improve quite a bit in fact.
Your best bet would be breeding a patternless het albino to an albino het patternless because that way any normal appearing offspring would be definite double hets. If breeding two patternless het albinos together (or two albinos het for patternless together), you would end up with a lot of possible hets.
Albino het patternless x albino het patternless:
results- 25% patternless albino
25% patternless het albino
25% albino 66% possible het patternless
25% 66% possible double het patternless albino
Albino het patternless x patternless het albino:
results- 25% patternless albino
25% albino het patternless
25% patternless het albino
25% double het patternless albino
I think that's right. If not I'm sure someone will correct me. It does get kind of confusing when dealing with double recessive traits.