Can't mention a certain website?

You really should just shut up and move on

not quite sure what part of this post you guys don't get...

Originally Posted by Shadera

Rich doesn't want the name mentioned, and fauna is his site to make the rules for.

this site is not a democracy, it belongs to Rich and he can do as he sees fit.

Charles, as I explained to you during our many PMs back and forth, your infraction was because you posted info directly from a site which is not allowed on here. Specifically you did so right after I posted saying it's not allowed. It had nothing to do with 'anonymous' statement.

Originally Posted by AbsoluteApril

Specifically you did so right after I posted saying it's not allowed. It had nothing to do with 'anonymous' statement.

Bingo. That's what gets people into trouble. They're warned not to do it, then someone comes along and does it. Trust me, I did pretty much the same thing myself one time, took my infraction in stride, and then changed my behavior because I value fauna as a place to hang out. Rich doesn't like it? Sure thing boss, won't do it again.

If someone doesn't like that one of the few rules Rich gives us here, I'm sure you won't be missed. It really is making a mountain out of a molehill.

Thats all fine. I understand now that the said site is a no go. I am not complaining about that, My proble is why the hell it is not in the rules any where. AbsoluteApril you still never showed me where. 2nd you said posting a link could not be done. I posted a pic that never showed where it was from. It showed a lot more of what Dr. Booth had to say. I just want to know why It can't be put in the rules so people know and don't get a infraction first to find out. jasballs you are not part of this, so if you don't want to read then you move on. Shadera I was not warned what I did was wrong. I thought doing how I did was good. As I said why can't rules be clear. I took my infraction over a year ago after rules got changed about location as I listed twincites MN and not Shoreview MN. That was my fault as I didn't keep up with the changes.

Nope there is no *official* rule about it. Which is why you didn't get any *official* infractions for it. But continuing to flaunt my request will have every bit the repercussions of violating the rules of this site. Let's just call it *my* rule.

It's a personal decision on my part. I was accused of engaging in illegal activities by members on that site, including Larry. I was threatened with physical violence. I was called nearly every profane and derogatory name in the book there.

Larry is just lucky that was not interested in playing in attorney's offices and courtrooms. I've just got better things to do with my time.

So, that site is just simply not welcome to be mentioned here in any fashion.

Anyone who does so will have their post edited to remove the reference. If it continues, then that member will be escorted out the door because of their then noted malicious intent.

If you need any further elaboration, you will have to continue that elsewhere other than on this site. This is all the explanation that is necessary or will be forthcoming.

Originally Posted by ReptilesForEver

jasballs you are not part of this, so if you don't want to read then you move on.

Last time I checked I was part of this since 2004 You want to know why Rich doesnt want that site mentioned here it is simple. He doesnt LIKE them. End of story! He doesnt have to put it out there. His warning for not saying it here should be enough.

beat me to it^^

Can someone please PM me what this black marked website is? I don't wish to incite any further arguments, but I truly have no idea what anyone is talking about and I'd rather not get in trouble for something I'm genuinely ignorant of.

EDIT: Thanks for the emails, guys! I appreciate it!

Originally Posted by snowgyre

Can someone please PM me what this black marked website is? I don't wish to incite any further arguments, but I truly have no idea what anyone is talking about and I'd rather not get in trouble for something I'm genuinely ignorant of.

just think of the movie Deliverance lol

Rich I am not and never was fighting over people being able to talk about them. I personally never go on there site or like it. I only went to it cause someone on facebook said Dr. Booth was there talking about whats been going on. I can't even say name of it as I am unsure of what it is called lol I just went to link that was given. I didn't need a reason why you didn't want it done. As it is your site and can do as you wish. I just was wanting to know why I did get the infraction I did get when there was nothing in the rules. I would think I have every right to ask that. I was keeping it off any post and was only talking to AbsoluteApril about it till this post was made in witch I thought you said this should be talked about here. She was cool about it all but I was only really told you didn't want it. That is fine. I just wish if there are going to be rules that they are posted so people don't find out when it is to late.
Again jasballs I don't care if you where here when fauna was started. And I didn't get a warning. I got a Infraction, so I think I have a right to ask what I have. I have not once said his rules are wrong in any way. I said not being told till after I got the infraction was.