Quote:
Originally posted by hockeymom
Well I agree but he was very strong on the fact that he wanted another lizard or I would have to refund 100% of his money plus pay to have the surviving lizard shipped back to me.
|
This is an unreasonable request and goes beyond the limit of your responsibility. If you refund the cost of the lizard, plus the shipping fees, then he can use that money to buy the other lizard and have it shipped to him. He still gets another lizard, but you are out of the picture.
There's no reason whatsoever to require you to buy the lizard and have it shipped to him.
If he doesn't want the surviving lizard, and prefers a full refund, then the cost of return shipping is his responsibility. Since you are offering a refund of the cost of the lizard plus shipping, he will be out no additional funds by accepting that and purchasing the other lizard himself.
The biggest problem with his demand is what if the replacement lizard you ordered for him arrives sick or dead? You have never seen the lizard, but you are the purchaser. You see the potential for massive headaches.
Quote:
If the shipper makes a mistake you feel the seller is responsible for total replacement. Even though as a seller we have done everything in our power to safely get our package to the shipping co.
Is there any type of insurance out there to cover the cost of reptiles lost or damaged durring shipments, or are we sol.
|
It is my opinion that yes, the seller is responsible to put a live animal in the hands of the buyer. If that seller chooses to use an overnight carrier, then they are responsible no matter what.
The clause so often seen on a sellers terms that they are not liable for carrier mistakes is BS as far as I'm concerned. Carriers will be delayed at times, and that's a risk you take when you choose to use their services to ship animals.
I don't like it, but that's the way it is. It isn't fair to place this burden on the buyer. The carrier will not take any responsibility at all, since they don't allow live animal shipments in the first place. As a seller, I feel you must bear the responsibility as a cost of doing business. It's not justified to put this risk on the buyer. They paid for a live animal and they can no more control the actions of the carrier than the seller can, but someone has to bear the responsibility.
The only time I can condone such a clause in a seller's terms is if they offer airline shipping and the buyer requests overnight carrier. In these cases, it would be acceptable to place that burden on the buyer since you offer other choices.
When you only offer shipping via UPS etc, then the responsibility during transit is yours.
As far as insurance to cover shipping problems, there is none.