Burmese Python Distinct Species

Burmese Python Distinct Species
CNAH ANNOUNCEMENT
The Center for North American Herpetology
Lawrence, Kansas
http://www.cnah.org
17 February 2010

BURMESE PYTHON RECOGNIZED AS DISTINCT SPECIES

Zur taxonomie des dunklen tigerpythons, Python molurus bivittatus Kuhl, 1820, speziell der population von Sulawesi

Hans J. Jacobs, Mark Auliya & Wolfgang Böhme

2009. Sauria 31(3): 5-16

Abstract: The taxonomic status of the Burmese Python (Python molurus bivittatus) is reassessed and elevated to specific rank again. The population from Sulawesi, Indonesia, is a dwarf form of this giant snake that is redefined as Python bivittatus progschai ssp. n.

Summary (part):
On the taxonomy of the Burmese Python, Python molurus bivittatus Kuhl, 1820,
specifically on the Sulawesi Population

The Indian python, Python m. molurus (Linnaeus, 1758) and the Burmese Python, P. m. bivittatus Kuhl, 1820 are constantly distinguished by two morphological characters, viz. "supralabials touching eye" versus "complete circumocular ring" and "lanceolate dorsal head pattern indistinct in front of eyes" versus "lanceolate dorsal pattern distinct to tip of snout." Despite their subspecific status (which requires allopatry or parapatry at least), the latter co-occur as several relict populations within the distribution range of the former (viz., at some sites in North India along the Nepalese border, and in East India in the Bengal region: Barker & Barker 2008), and, despite their close relationship and their ability to crossbreed in captivity (O’Shea 2007), both maintain their phenotypic identities without interbreeding in nature. This argues strongly for selective pressures against hybridization, which is what we regard as typical for incipient speciation. We therefore once more raise the Burmese Python to specific rank.

So would this mean that the current legislations about to be voted on would have to be further amended to include this new species since it is currently being considered as part of the Indian Python complex and if those legislations weren't properly amended the one species that the legislations are using as a scapegoat wouldn't even be covered under the Lacy Act? That would be kind of hilarious, and I kinda wish this had been published after the voting of these bills cuz it sure would have been great to essentially watch those moron politicians and NGOs with egg on their faces if the bill were to pass.LOL.

Perhaps if the legislation were to pass we should get the names of all those affected species immediately and appropriately "updated" just to render that idiotic bill useless until it's further amended and then we can continue to play musical name games with them till the Feds find something better to do? I'm joking of course but sometimes fighting stupid with stupid is the only way to go.

So would this mean that the current legislations about to be voted on would have to be further amended to include this new species since it is currently being considered as part of the Indian Python complex and if those legislations weren't properly amended the one species that the legislations are using as a scapegoat wouldn't even be covered under the Lacy Act? That would be kind of hilarious, and I kinda wish this had been published after the voting of these bills cuz it sure would have been great to essentially watch those moron politicians and NGOs with egg on their faces if the bill were to pass.LOL.

Perhaps if the legislation were to pass we should get the names of all those affected species immediately and appropriately "updated" just to render that idiotic bill useless until it's further amended and then we can continue to play musical name games with them till the Feds find something better to do? I'm joking of course but sometimes fighting stupid with stupid is the only way to go.

great idea