Jeremy Pierce/Kansas

I apologize if this is off topic, but I have another observation...Susan, you're familiar enough with the site to make comments that "pissing matches are all too common here"... But not the rules for posting that things don't just get deleted and " who cares"...also, proof typically helps in backing up your side of the story. It's a pretty convincing picture of mites, but there needs to be more, or your side of the story is simply that... We don't know you at all, and I don't commonly just takes peoples word for it when passing judgement about someone's business practices...

And I'm with Nickolas, each of your posts so far differs from the other post. So coming from someone I know nothing about, with no evidence to back her story, is basically just three different stories...your defensiveness that we just don't believe you doesn't help either, sorry...

There see, I stayed on topic

I don't think pissing matches happen here, I was only inferring from her comment that she must have used fauna before to come to that opinion...

Originally Posted by soooeee

pissing match which is all to common here.

I think you are confusing a pursuit for clarity and justice with pissing matches. As Nickolas has said, if you were the subject of a bad guy thread, we would not accept vague accusations either.

Originally Posted by soooeee

I do not have any emails as I did not make the deal for the purchase.

Somehow I doubt this. Around the time of the deal you would be emailing the collector, and after your allegations it would be logical to expect further emails to him.

Originally Posted by soooeee

Hope this clears it up, but if not - too bad! I'm done!

I think vendors might think twice before selling to you. What seller would want to have his or her name on the BOI with vague allegations, with you accusing readers who have valid questions about those allegations as pissers, and then walking off?

I just want to know who the jerk who let the animal get covered in mites without treating it was? The chain of events is very difficult to understand and the unnamed third party is not helping any of us follow the story.

Even if one of these stories is true, the op didn't buy anything from Jeremy and he owes her nothing. She needs to seek compensation from the person she sent her rattlesnakes to.

At this point it's up to the OP to show documentation. I try to keep an open mind and it doesn't look convincing when the OP gets irritated with reasonable questions and deflects the issue by complaining about pissing matches and the BOI. I would not want to label someone a bad guy based on a photo and some conflicting storylines. It's only fair to get both sides of the story and, hopefully the whole story, before deciding someone is a bad guy.

I'm really not understanding the OP's hostility toward questions and the "whatever, I've said what I'm going to say and that's it" attitude. It really does make one wonder about an ulterior motive. Maybe you're just irritated, fine, but you're posting a serious allegation and should be prepared to back it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by tlmoon

At this point it's up to the OP to show documentation. I try to keep an open mind and it doesn't look convincing when the OP gets irritated with reasonable questions and deflects the issue by complaining about pissing matches and the BOI. I would not want to label someone a bad guy based on a photo and some conflicting storylines. It's only fair to get both sides of the story and, hopefully the whole story, before deciding someone is a bad guy.

I'm really not understanding the OP's hostility toward questions and the "whatever, I've said what I'm going to say and that's it" attitude. It really does make one wonder about an ulterior motive. Maybe you're just irritated, fine, but you're posting a serious allegation and should be prepared to back it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not wishing to defend the op in any way shape or form but if you go right back to post #1 the op states they are NOT wishing to label Jeremy a bad guy and this is not actually a bad guy BOI.
But op does seem to have a strange attitude here for sure

Actually the red X at the top of this thread does make it a bad guy thread..

Originally Posted by leftycrane

Actually the red X at the top of this thread does make it a bad guy thread..

LMAO, time for some new glasses
Strange that they would say "I am not calling Jeremy a bad guy" and yet create a bad guy boi thread
My apologies for not reading correctly....time for more coffee as well I think.

LOL no worries. I found it odd too