Frogman11-Garrett Smith

Originally Posted by Frogman11

He admitted to doing this on my BOI.

Can you please link this admission so we can see it?

Originally Posted by Lucille

Can you please link this admission so we can see it?

This appears to be the post that Garrett was referencing. Garrett, were you threatening this person?

Originally Posted by dieselfan

Oh this is too funny. Garrett is somehow now the victim of the "fauna bullies". Pfft!! Anyone reading this can look on my wall and see the BS Garrett posted last year and for record you had not sold those animals during my inquirey, you started stumbling over your own words after being called out on the bogus information that YOU presented. For some reason you could not remember if your rare, high end animals were WC or CBB.

The important part about Garrett Smith is that he makes promises that he cant keep, takes peoples money, does not deliver, and will flat steal your money all the while telling you that you are stupid, impatient and that you do not understand how importing works! Infact he STILL owes several people who have replied to this thread thousands of dollars. Garrett used the stolen monies to buy "high end" iguanas which he thought he could buy and flip and then refund the customers he screwed. As it turns out no one wants to buy anything from Garrett and he is still to this day trying to sell/trade them! The real knee slapper is the only people who came forward to defend him were scammers and smugglers as well. Minus one guy who posted today. Infact others who were forced to use Garrett as an importer went out of their way to hide having done business with him.

Garrett I love pounding you with negative karma everytime you post on this site. After your 11pm phone calls to my phone and you threatening me for over a year your lucky I did not swing by your house this summer while I was out in California visiting family. Hopefully potential customers see that line of red squares next to your name and they think twice and or do a BOI search. BTW I never crank called your home. I DID use your CELL number in some bogus Craigslist ad's! Seriously you deserve so much worse!! Keep up the smoke and mirrors.. Its totally working

Posting fake ads on Craigslist is childish and low. Harassing you by calling your house is also juvenile. Regardless of what you've done, no one should be subjected to that.

Originally Posted by Lucille

I don't think it is funny. I would be interested in the proof, of how you went about finding who did this, and I think that proof might be helpful to others who may have had or will have similar actions taken against them.

How is he harassing you, here?

I'm at work. When I'm home I'll post the steps I took to do this.

Originally Posted by Lucille

This appears to be the post that Garrett was referencing. Garrett, were you threatening this person?

Not at all, It was the other way around. I don't know him from atom. If you read that post you can see how creepy he is. He has no idea of any of my transaction but yet makes up an entire senero on what I'm doing. I did say that if he comes by my house like he stated that he will be infor a big surprise. That's how far some people go, because the didn't get the reptile they wanted.

Seems like a lot of non-factual and emotionally laced accusations being thrown around in this thread about the duties and responsibilities of staff on this site.

First off, when someone reports what appears to be an abusive post (meaning: in violation to the rules of engagement in the BOI or of this site in general), one or more of the moderators will take a look at it, and determine what, if any, action seems prudent to be taken. If an infraction appears to be warranted, no one else but the recipient of that infraction will be aware of that action being taken. That information is not made public. So no one will KNOW what actions have taken place. Perhaps some people would like to be able to gloat over such things, but it was my decision to make such administrative actions private between the staff and the parties directly involved. Yes, I know that this could lead someone to believe that they are being victimized by being the ONLY person getting infractions, but that just is not the case. You just cannot SEE what other infractions have been issued to other parties.

Now, about "harassment". It has been my experience that this term is normally defined as "that person said mean things about me". And accordingly, the recipient of such "harassment" wants staff here to smite that offending person, normally with an eternal ban or heck, even death to the OP if they could get that wish granted. Sorry, but that is not our job. We try hard not to get involved personally in personal issues between parties. That is a thankless job that normally just turns BOTH parties against us. We sometimes do express our PERSONAL opinions about matters, but officially as staff, we just do not take sides. Quite often, we really don't even CARE about either side. It's just not our fight. And in that light, there is just no way we want to get involved in the personal flame wars that often blow up here. We just expect everyone to have their "big boy" pants on and deal with their own battles themselves while we take care of maintaining the enforcement of the rules of this site. And those rules do not state anything about protecting YOU from anyone else's expressed opinions and statements about you.

As for "truth"? Sorry, but we are not private investigators and have absolutely no obligation, much less intention, of trying to determine any truth of any statements made by someone else. Other readers may require it before making their own determination about a statement, but there is no requirement here for such proof. If there were, then we would find ourselves obligated to try to determine whether such "proof" actually was legitimate or not. Which, of course, is just not feasible or realistic for anyone to expect.

Bottom line is that this site is run the way it is because after many trial and error attempts at various methodologies, THIS is the best way I have found for it to be run. Those that like it (or at least find it tolerable and helpful) are welcome to avail themselves of the benefits of using this site. To those who do not like it, and feel that I am obligated to allow them to utilize the resources of this site in order to belittle it and the membership, quite frankly, GO POUND SAND WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE. I don't need you here. I don't WANT you here. I don't require that you like this site, but I damned sight am not going to allow you to remain here if your only purpose of being here is to belittle it, my staff, the membership, or myself. You don't like this site? Fine. Express yourself in the Site Assistance and Feedback Forum and we'll take about it. As long as it is done respectfully. Otherwise, if that isn't good enough for you, go somewhere else and bitch about it. I've heard that Facebook is good for that, so have at it. Continue making yourself a burr under my saddle with your antagonistic and malicious postings about your distaste for this site, and trust me, you will not be here for long. I have absolutely no qualms whatsoever about escorting you to the door personally and booting you out permanently. I will live just as long never seeing another word posted by you on this site. And all things considered, seems you would rather not be here anyway, so it's a win/win for everyone.

So make your choice, please. I really, REALLY don't give a damn either way.

Originally Posted by WebSlave

Seems like a lot of non-factual and emotionally laced accusations being thrown around in this thread about the duties and responsibilities of staff on this site.

First off, when someone reports what appears to be an abusive post (meaning: in violation to the rules of engagement in the BOI or of this site in general), one or more of the moderators will take a look at it, and determine what, if any, action seems prudent to be taken. If an infraction appears to be warranted, no one else but the recipient of that infraction will be aware of that action being taken. That information is not made public. So no one will KNOW what actions have taken place. Perhaps some people would like to be able to gloat over such things, but it was my decision to make such administrative actions private between the staff and the parties directly involved. Yes, I know that this could lead someone to believe that they are being victimized by being the ONLY person getting infractions, but that just is not the case. You just cannot SEE what other infractions have been issued to other parties.

Now, about "harassment". It has been my experience that this term is normally defined as "that person said mean things about me". And accordingly, the recipient of such "harassment" wants staff here to smite that offending person, normally with an eternal ban or heck, even death to the OP if they could get that wish granted. Sorry, but that is not our job. We try hard not to get involved personally in personal issues between parties. That is a thankless job that normally just turns BOTH parties against us. We sometimes do express our PERSONAL opinions about matters, but officially as staff, we just do not take sides. Quite often, we really don't even CARE about either side. It's just not our fight. And in that light, there is just no way we want to get involved in the personal flame wars that often blow up here. We just expect everyone to have their "big boy" pants on and deal with their own battles themselves while we take care of maintaining the enforcement of the rules of this site. And those rules do not state anything about protecting YOU from anyone else's expressed opinions and statements about you.

As for "truth"? Sorry, but we are not private investigators and have absolutely no obligation, much less intention, of trying to determine any truth of any statements made by someone else. Other readers may require it before making their own determination about a statement, but there is no requirement here for such proof. If there were, then we would find ourselves obligated to try to determine whether such "proof" actually was legitimate or not. Which, of course, is just not feasible or realistic for anyone to expect.

Bottom line is that this site is run the way it is because after many trial and error attempts at various methodologies, THIS is the best way I have found for it to be run. Those that like it (or at least find it tolerable and helpful) are welcome to avail themselves of the benefits of using this site. To those who do not like it, and feel that I am obligated to allow them to utilize the resources of this site in order to belittle it and the membership, quite frankly, GO POUND SAND WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE. I don't need you here. I don't WANT you here. I don't require that you like this site, but I damned sight am not going to allow you to remain here if your only purpose of being here is to belittle it, my staff, the membership, or myself. You don't like this site? Fine. Express yourself in the Site Assistance and Feedback Forum and we'll take about it. As long as it is done respectfully. Otherwise, if that isn't good enough for you, go somewhere else and bitch about it. I've heard that Facebook is good for that, so have at it. Continue making yourself a burr under my saddle with your antagonistic and malicious postings about your distaste for this site, and trust me, you will not be here for long. I have absolutely no qualms whatsoever about escorting you to the door personally and booting you out permanently. I will live just as long never seeing another word posted by you on this site. And all things considered, seems you would rather not be here anyway, so it's a win/win for everyone.

So make your choice, please. I really, REALLY don't give a damn either way.

I for one like how it's ran. It makes for great intertainment.

Originally Posted by Frogman11

I for one like how it's ran. It makes for great intertainment.

Smith, you really do like walking on the edge.
This coukd have been a good boi for you and yet you insist on STILL acting like a petulant child.
Its your attitude and temper that is the problem right now, not even so much your past actions.

For somebody with as much proclaimed dislike of the boi, its members and the way its run you sure do like to flap your gums here quite a bit.
As Rich says, if you don't like it, don't let the door hit you in the back of the head on your way out.

Originally Posted by Black Adder

This coukd have been a good boi for you and yet you insist on STILL acting like a petulant child.

.

The OP was even being defended for making a positive post by these BOI "regulars", but it certainly isn't coming off as positive impression of Garrett now....

Originally Posted by Frogman11

I'm the one LMAO. You Chris Kennard have been on this site since 2003, and have ZERO positive feedback!!!!! That says everything right there. You proved my exact point and I know you would. Your too predictable.

The few that support Chris Kennard what do you know about this guy? Let me help you. He runs an extreme rightwing page on Facebook called HAGR Headquarters FB. Check out the link below and see what this wack job spews on it. https://www.facebook.com/groups/3955...31610/?fref=nf

How many times have you been banned from here? I know of 2...lol

I did a quick back round check on him and WHOA check this out:


April 8, 2005 Bankruptcy

Arrested December 8, 2009 A
Convicted of Dr Unregist Veh - 1301 A in PA (#TR-0003276-09)

Arrested March 7, 2010
Court Case Offense: DUI: Gen Imp (Bac .08 - .10) 1st Off (#CR-0000135-10)
Convicted April 28th
Convicted of DUI: Gen Imp (Bac .08 - .10) 1st Off - 3802 A2 in PA (#CR-0000135-10)
Sentenced To DUI: Gen Imp (Bac .08 - .10) 1st Off (M) in Delaware, PA (#CR-0000135-10)

May 7, 2010
Court Case Charges Filed for 2 Counts of DUI: Gen Imp (Bac .08 - .10) 1st Off (M) in Delaware, PA (#CR-0000135-10)
Court Case Case Filed for DUI: Gen Imp (Bac .08 - .10) 1st Off in Delaware County, Prospect Park, Pennsylvania - Admin Office of Courts (#CR-0000135-10)

July 6, 2010
Traffic Offense: Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)

July 20, 2010
Traffic Charges Filed for Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect in Delaware, PA (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Traffic Case Filed for Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect in Delaware County, Media, Pennsylvania - PA Aoc Traffic Disposition Citation 1 (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)

Arrested September 22, 2010
Plead Guilty To Traffic Charges Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Convicted of Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect - Mdj-32-1-33 in PA (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Sentenced To Operat Veh Without Valid Inspect in Delaware, PA (#MJ-32133-TR-0003417-2010_KEN_CHR_19640224)

Jan. 6 2011
Traffic Offense: Careless Driving (#TR-0000027-11)
Traffic Offense: Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps (#TR-0000028-11)

Jan. 7 2011
Traffic Charges Filed for Careless Driving in Delaware, PA (#TR-0000027-11)
Traffic Charges Filed for Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps in Delaware, PA (#TR-0000028-11)
Traffic Case Filed for Careless Driving and Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps in Delaware County, Media, Pennsylvania - Admin Office of Courts (#TR-0000027-11)

May 24, 2012
Traffic Offense: Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640224)

Arrested May 30, 2012
Plead Guilty To Traffic Charges Careless Driving (#TR-0000027-11)
Convicted of Careless Driving - 3714 A in PA (#TR-0000027-11)
Sentenced To Careless Driving in Delaware, PA (#TR-0000027-11)
Plead Guilty To Traffic Charges Careless Driving and Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps (#TR-0000028-11)
Convicted of Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps - 4302 A1 in PA (#TR-0000028-11)
Sentenced To Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps in Delaware, PA (#TR-0000028-11) To Period for Requiring Lighted Lamps in Delaware, PA (#TR-0000028-11)

Jun 19 2012
Traffic Charges Filed for Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked in Delaware, PA (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Traffic Case Filed for Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked in Delaware County, Media, Pennsylvania - PA Aoc Traffic Disposition Citation 2 (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640224)

July 24 2012
Guilty of a Lesser Charge Traffic Charges Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Convicted of Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked in PA (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640224)
Sentenced To Driv While Oper Priv Susp or Revoked in Delaware, PA (#MJ-32238-TR-0000626-2012_KEN_CHR_19640

There was some judgments agents him that required me to pay to see them. I wasn't about to spend a penny on this. I figured 2 DUI's and 4 or more arrests was enough for me to see. I think you get the jest of this clown.

You want people to do there research on who the're buy from...Well I did my research on who's trying to lie and discredit me.....and Whoa you didn't disappoint Kennard.

Thanks again Jerrod and John for the positive comment. I'm sorry you got caught up in the buffoonery of the BOI.

Now that I can type (albeit painfully, but well worth it), allow me to address your pathetic attempt to compare a ciriminal to a guy missing bulbs in his headlights. First off, I have no positive feedback because I don't encourage or solicit people to do so, unlike you. You did, however, forget to mention negative feedback with regard to any deals I've ever done. Why? Unlike you, I've NEVER screwed anyone, and never will. And that!...say's everything right there! As for the "extreme" right wing group? Lol, now I get you. I'm a proud voter of Trump, and don't hide it. But why would anyone know that? This isn't a political forum. But go ahead and hang your liberal hat on that if it helps you take the focus off of your criminal history, as opposed to my traffic violations (headlamps, whatever). Nice job Columbo! No need to post your crimes here, which are international. Wait, what? Tell me again about my traffic violations in a town in Pa.? By the way, no one "tried" to lie and discredit you. You did that all by your itty bitty self. I'm sure the OP had an awesome experience with you. Funny thing is, itI seems to be the only one you could con into