HSUS & Florida Politicians Undermine Efforts to Kill Constrictor Rule! - FaunaClassifieds
 Sponsors »  Breeders | Dealers |  Importers/Exporters | Caging | Feed | Supplies | Services | Events 
  Inside FaunaClassifieds » Product Reviews |  Classifieds!   | Photo Gallery   | Banner Advertising 
  Want to help support this site? Click here.

Go Back   FaunaClassifieds > Laws, Legislative Issues & Alerts > General Legislative Discussions


General Legislative Discussions Any general discussion concerning legislative issues or events. Not necessarily specific to a particular region, or even a type of animal group.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2012, 01:34 PM   #1
HSUS & Florida Politicians Undermine Efforts to Kill Constrictor Rule!

HSUS & Florida Politicians Undermine Efforts to Kill Constrictor Rule!

Most that have followed the development of the Constrictor Rule for the last several years know that last Tuesday US Fish & Wildlife Service enacted a final rule regarding the addition of Burmese python and 3 other constricting snakes. The following blog post from HSUS CEO Wayne Pacelle demonstrates how HSUS coordinated a letter writing campaign from Senator Bill Nelson and several Florida Congressional members to sabotage the work of USARK to completely kill the Constrictor Rule. This is an interesting look into the mind and manipulations of the extreme Animal Right Industry. Please READ!

HSUS has recently been a BIG POT calling the little USARK Kettle Black... insinuating that USARK can buy our way through Washington like they do every day

The following is reproduced from HSUS; Humane Nation Blog: http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2012/0...nake-news.html

The Way Washington Works

It’s amazing how in Washington, D.C., the simplest things can turn into a mess.

Today’s announcement by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in the Everglades to ban the import and trade in Burmese pythons, yellow anacondas, and northern and southern African pythons is, to be sure, an important advance—for animal welfare, conservation, and public safety. These large constricting snakes are not suitable as pets; they suffer from capture in the wild and long-distance transport for trade; they can injure and kill people who possess or interact with them; and they can wreak havoc on our natural resources as an invasive species, killing native wildlife, including endangered animals.

But there’s a back story here, and it says so much about Washington, D.C., and how good policy and common-sense ideas get scuttled, delayed, or weakened in this town, to the detriment of the nation.

Here’s a timeline.

June 2006: The South Florida Water Management District petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) requesting the listing of Burmese pythons as injurious under the Lacey Act, a federal law that regulates trade in wildlife.

January 2008: FWS published a Notice of Inquiry in the Federal Register asking the public for comments on several large constrictor snakes.

July 2009: U.S. Senator Bill Nelson of Florida testified before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee about the dangers posed by large constricting snakes to Florida’s ecosystems, unveiling the skin of a 17-foot Burmese python perhaps shed in the Everglades.

October 2009: The U.S. Geological Survey issued a science-based report that identifies nine species of large, constricting snakes as posing a medium or high risk as invasive species in the United States.

March 2010: FWS issued a proposed rule to list nine large constrictor snakes as injurious under the Lacey Act.

January 2011: Open Secrets, a website that discloses federal lobbying expenditures, announced that the U.S. Association of Reptile Keepers spent $120,000 lobbying against the FWS rule. USARK submitted a report saying that banning the trade in these species would cost the industry $100 million–an utterly absurd figure.

March 2011: The White House Office of Management and Budget/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs received the final rule from FWS. (This White House agency's review process is usually 90 days, yet the rule was held up for 10 months.)

January 2012: Salazar makes the announcement covering only the four species.

What or who got in the way here? There’s only one reasonable explanation: narrow thinking and poor political judgment at OMB.

The folks who run OMB for President Barack Obama are focused on the vulnerability of the administration on the jobs issue, with Obama facing a competitive re-election with high unemployment numbers. So when USARK and its lobbyists made a jobs argument, it struck a nerve at OMB. OMB appeared ready to kill the whole thing, until lawmakers from Florida on both sides of the aisle started demanding action. Ten of the 11 largest newspapers in Florida urged adoption of the FWS rule and demanded that the Obama administration stop dragging its feet and do something about the trade in these invasive, dangerous species.

The administration had to do something; it had to deal with the Burmese python. But in the end, it excluded five species from the import restrictions—two of which, boa constrictors and reticulated pythons, alone make up two-thirds of the trade. As a result, the trade is likely to shift to these species. Salazar said his agency will watch and see how things are going with the other constrictor snakes, and consider banning the other five species down the road, but given the administration’s track record on this issue, that seems highly implausible.

So, in the end, no one is happy—not animal advocates or environmentalists, or even the reptile dealers. The administration shows itself as weak, quick to jettison science for politics, and essentially tone-deaf on this entire issue in the critical battleground state of Florida, whose electorate and opinion leaders clearly want something done about invasive species of snakes.

And for the animal protection community, the burning question is, if OMB cannot stand up to the reptile dealers—who created this problem by peddling high-risk snakes to unqualified individuals and cost the government tens of millions of dollars in invasive species control efforts—how is it going to handle the really tough animal welfare problems the country faces?
Old 01-21-2012, 01:52 PM   #2
I still don't see why the federal government needs to deal with a problem in Florida. I guess that is what happens when we continue to let the constitution get $hit on.

Join now to reply to this thread or open new ones for your questions & comments! FaunaClassifieds.com is the largest online community about Reptile & Amphibians, Snakes, Lizards and number one classifieds service with thousands of ads to look for. Registration is open to everyone and FREE. Click Here to Register!


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USARK & Reptile Nation Save 5 of 9 species from FWS Constrictor Rule! USARK.Jonathan.Brady General Legislative Discussions 207 01-28-2012 08:55 PM
FWS Files Final Rule/ Constrictor Ban EricWI General Legislative Discussions 0 04-06-2011 09:51 PM
New Kill-Rule Change Campaign: Public Comment Re-Opened USARK.Jonathan.Brady General Legislative Discussions 3 07-08-2010 12:28 AM
Kill Rule Change Message from Andrew USARK.Jonathan.Brady General Legislative Discussions 0 05-05-2010 09:05 PM
HSUS Propaganda Targets Boa Constrictor! Bill & Amy General Legislative Discussions 0 10-18-2009 10:10 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Ebates Coupons and Cash Back

Fauna Top Sites

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.03271508 seconds with 9 queries
Content copyrighted ©2002-2018, FaunaClassifieds, LLC