| Author | Subject: Charles Pierce "Uninformed" |
| John Staursky | Posted At 00:30:12 06/29/2001
I responded to an inquiry below on Craig Wyatt who I have lagitametly dealt with many times to reccomend him to others as a good guy. In response to my reccomendation I was slandered by this Charles Pierce guy saying that I was not a good reccomendation because he did a search on me and I had over 20 bad guy hits?? Link: http://herpwantads.com/forums/Inquiry/posts/4816.html THIS HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL POST, CHARLES PIERCE SEEMS TO THINK THAT IF HE DOES A SEARCH ON MY NAME THAT WHATEVER COMES UP IS SUPPOSEDLY BAD. IT NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED THAT IF YOU DO A SEARCH ON SOMEONES NAME ALL IT DOES IS PULL UP WHEREVER THEIR NAME HAS BEEN TYPED IN, NOT IF IT WAS A POST, A RESPONSE, OR A GOOD GUY BAD GUY POST. Rich, Can you delate that guys response as it has absolutely nothing to do with the inquiry and it is CLEARLY a violation of the rules and in MY OPINION guys like that are just trying to start a soap opera on these boards. Thanks, John Staursky p.s. I will never cease to be amazed at how many friggin weirdos there are on the internet |
| Jordan Russell |
Re: Charles Pierce
5032.html Posted At 05:47:27 06/30/2001 you want some cheese with that wine? lol ... :) |
| John Staursky |
Re: Charles Pierce
5033.html Posted At 10:18:10 06/30/2001 Jordan, Nahh, I'm ok now, it just felt good to get that off my chest. LOL It just caught me a little off guard but I guess it's not a big deal. John |