PDA

View Full Version : The U.S. Government's INTERNET FRAUD COMPLAINT CENTER - Great Guys!


brucestephenson
11-21-2003, 07:20 AM
Do you want to get even with some punk who definitely ripped you off? He will be singing like a canary when the feds bang on his door. Check this out:



For Immediate Release
April 9, 2003 Washington D.C.
FBI National Press Office

Internet Fraud Complaint Center Referred More Than 48,000 Fraud Complaints to Law Enforcement in 2002
Referrals Triple Since 2001, Fraud Losses Total $54 Million

RICHMOND, VA -- The Internet Fraud Complaint Center (IFCC) released its annual Internet Fraud Report today showing that, on behalf of victims, the IFCC referred 48,252 fraud complaints to federal, state and/or local law enforcement authorities last year. This referral rate is triple the number of referrals (16,775) in 2001. The report also states that the total dollar loss from all referred fraud cases was $54 million, up from $17 million in 2001.

The 2002 annual report offers a recap of Internet crime hot spots by state, statistical information, and victim demographic data gleaned through complaints IFCC has received and referred through its on-line Web portal located at www.ifccfbi.gov from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. In 2002, complaints filed with IFCC totaled 75,063.

"The IFCC helps victims by putting fraud information into the hands of law enforcement and then fosters inter-agency cooperation so these complaints are responded to quickly," said Assistant Director Jana Monroe of the FBI's Cyber Division.

For the third straight year, Internet auction fraud was the most reported offense, comprising 46% of referred complaints. Non-delivery of merchandise and non-payment accounted for 31% of complaints, and credit/debit card fraud made up nearly 12% of complaints. Among victims who reported a dollar loss, the highest median dollar losses were found among Nigerian letter fraud ($3,864), identity theft ($2,000), and check fraud ($1,100) complainants.

California, New York, Florida, Texas, and Illinois were the top five states for victims of Internet crime. In cases where the perpetrator has been identified, nearly four in five were male and over half resided in the states of California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania.

IFCC processed an additional 36,920 complaints on computer intrusions, unsolicited e-mail (SPAM), child pornography, and other violations of law. For computer-related filings but which are not considered Internet fraud, IFCC referred these to agencies and organizations that handle those particular complaints.

IFCC has aggressively developed partnerships with agencies to enhance its ability to quickly serve victims of fraud and cyber crime. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the FBI's Innocent Images task force, the National Infrastructure Protection Center, the Federal Trade Commission, and the U.S. Secret Service are regular recipients of IFCC complaint information.

Only one in four complainants contacted a law enforcement agency about their victimization prior to filing a complaint with IFCC.

"As on-line usage continues to climb, consumer education must focus not only on preventive strategies, but also on where an individual can turn for help. IFCC is in a position to handle just such an effort to help victims and assist law enforcement," said Richard L. Johnston, Director of the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C).

Operational since May 2000, IFCC is co-managed by NW3C (www.nw3c.org) and the FBI (www.fbi.gov). IFCC is an on-line resource to file Internet fraud complaints that will be referred to law enforcement authorities that have the ability to initiate a case on the consumer's behalf.

To obtain a copy of IFCC's 2002 Internet Fraud Report, visit www.ifccfbi.gov

###



| 2003 Press Releases | FBI Home Page |

brucestephenson
11-21-2003, 07:32 AM
Dear Webslave,

Could you please change Internet Fraud CRIME Center to Internet Fraud COMPLAINT Center in the title of my thread? I started working on this at 5 a.m. and messed up.

Thanks Much,
Bruce.

Bci Joe
11-21-2003, 07:34 AM
where does it say anything about knocking on punks doors and getting back money or animals?
i'm sorry, i know you mean well... maybe you read my post on the Jeremy Clark 'Scammer' thread, page 7.
i've lost thousands of dollars to many of these punks and never had any help whatsoever from the IFCC.

thanks
Joe Rollo

brucestephenson
11-21-2003, 07:52 AM
The AOL Welcome Page has a story today, http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20031120130909990001&_mpc=news%2e10%2e11,
with John Ashcroft announcing that they were going after more run-of-the-mill punks also. Since the Attorney General is hyping this, maybe we should hold him to his word and ask him why he is ignoring taxpayer's complaints about what is basically a crime wave in our industry?
I agree that you should be getting service from your complaints.

DThomas
11-21-2003, 08:41 AM
I also posted an explanation of what the IFCC does in the Jeremy Clark thread.

The IFCC is a clearing house. They do NOT investigate. They send all complaints to local law enforcement and it is up to that agency to investigate or not.

Alot of local agencies are not able to investigate internet fraud. It is a time consuming and technically difficult crime to investigate. For prosecution, the invesigator needs to prove who was sitting at the computer at the time the crime was committed. In a house full of people it could have been anyone. Names mean nothing. You have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt who was sitting there.

Bci Joe
11-21-2003, 09:31 AM
Thanks guys, and I do believe they did get the info to the appropriate agencies... but then if these agencies have never done a thing about it, what's the point?
I do agree it must be extensive work but to avoid it because of that? that leads me to agree with what was said - why are they letting this crime to taxpayers continue?
Just my thoughts... thanks guys

Joe Rollo

DThomas
11-21-2003, 11:16 AM
It really boils down to simple economics. Not enough people, time and resources to investigate every case. A couple hundred dollar loss does not justify to the command staff a potential of thousands of dollars in man hours and resources to investigate. Unfortunately, the scammers know this and is why they usually keep the dollar amount low. It may not seem low to the person affected but in the larger picture, it is a very low amount compared to what is happening everyday.

For example this is what I face everyday. My department has 10 fraud detectives. On avergae my department receives well over 300 fraud reports a month. There is no way we can investigate everyone of those. So my Sgt. reads everyone and prioritizes them by reasonable likelihood of being solved and charged. On average we receive 15 new cases every month. We work a 4/10 schedule so thats a new case a day. Some cases can be cleared in a day, others I have had take months to finish. There really is no telling where a case can take you.

Most departments around the country, mine included, are under manned and under funded. And the scammers usually have much better technology then we do. It is a constant game of catch up just to stay afloat.

I am not trying to make excuses. Just providing a little insight on why things may not be done. The average citizen does not see what goes on behind the scene and quite frankly I think most people would be shocked to realize how much is actually happening on a daily bases.

And remember one saying if anyone thinks their local department is not doing enough......

"The squeaky wheel gets the grease."

Make enough noise and you just might get results.

brucestephenson
11-23-2003, 11:38 PM
I believe that whenever any of us are definitely ripped off we should file a complaint with the U.S. Government's INTERNET FRAUD COMPLAINT CENTER http://www.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp
even though we have not seen any herp results on the BOI yet.
It is still great revenge on the punk because he or she gets into the Fed's Database as being a bad guy. As a history buff, I can almost completely assure you that he or she will remain in the CARNIVORE SYSTEM forever. That is not a good thing, and I would e-mail the punk telling him or her so. ;)

colubridman88
11-25-2003, 12:47 AM
Does anyone know how long it usually takes to nab people who rip you off? I filed a complaint with the IFCC(Internet Fraud Complaint Commision)(i think) about a month ago. At this point i just want to see the jerk in jail. Even though me and my partner took quite a hit. Do they send you a notice or something? I figure it will probably take a while. Has anyone had a succesful experience? If so, what happened. I appreciate any feedback.
Jesse Smith

colubridman88
11-25-2003, 12:49 AM
Do they file charges against these people? Issue a Warrant? What exactly happens?
Jesse Smith

Bci Joe
11-25-2003, 08:32 AM
That's exactly my gripe here. As far as i'm concerned, from what I physically see, there was NO nabbing, or nothing to that extent. They emailed me ONCE to follow up, maybe 2 months later. Besides that, I had to call and write and call and email and deal with so many people who didn't have any answers for me.. It was very frustrating to say the least.

I don't believe you should 'take this lying down', as some people put it.
I also don't think you should get your hopes up or hold your breath.

The way I looked at it (from experience) is t consider it a loss, a $XXX.00 lesson, if you will, and keep pursuing action.
If the money/animals shows up, great! If not, I already wrote it off long ago.
I just see no point these days in getting frustrated and aggravated..
I've had enough stress and anxiety from other sources..
these punks aren't worth my health, undestand?!