Quote:
Originally Posted by rodneynboalich
Then how was it illegal to add the snakes to the lacey if there's is no standards or protocols for listing
|
You are the one that is arguing for a lawsuit for adding the animals. I told you it was a lost cause.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodneynboalich
And no its not a lacey act violation to ship out of a state to another country like you posted...and that another issue usark should be focusing on
|
Actually it is.
Quote:
§ 3372. Prohibited acts
(a)
Offenses other than marking offenses
It is unlawful for any person -
(1)
to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire,
or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken,
possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any la
w, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in
violation of any Indian tribal law;
(2)
to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce -
(A)
any fish or wildlife taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law or
regulation of any State or in violation of any foreign law;
|
Mr. Boalich, I think you might want to read what we are talking about.
You are the expert, and yet the person you claim is never read it, is proving you wrong by quoting it.
That part is also important in another manner.
You see here it states it either has to be regulated by a state or US government. The lacey act, its self can not ban species. It only enforces on the federal level other regulations.
Which is why adding the 5 to the lacey act is illegal, when they are not regulated by anything else.