Originally Posted by EdwardK

One of the reasons I trust the peer reviewed science is that the researchers who do the reviews are not necessarily in the same country and are kept anonymous from the author(s) so it makes the arguments that the papers represent the government's positions because of funding a bit of folklore.
It's easy to dismiss a paper listed and accessed via a government site without reading it because you're biased against the government but the researchers aren't US researchers and are very unlikely to be funded by the US government.
Are you suggesting that all of the world governments are funding research for the same results which would mean that an overreaching global government is already in place so why tolerate any dissent?

Ed