Quote:
Originally Posted by rodneynboalich
The fws has to do a long process to prove in a sense that animals should be listed as injurious...which is a preemptive listing to avoid the animals becoming invasive...that's what the usgs study was for all the other studies...that's why the government hired herpotlogist reed and rodda..
When it's an injurious listing there all kinds of data required....
As for the secretary of the interior....they are able to do a listing via executive order when the listing via the judicial process is being held up....
The secretary of the interior can't just list animals as injurious....
Only burms can be considered invasive...the rest of the snakes were all listed because reed rodda study being considered sufficient by the fws NISC and the secretary of the interior for there listing as injurious....
|
Actually that is not listed anywhere in the lacey act. You said I did not read it, but you clearly have not either.
Post where the lacey act says they have to do anything you said?
1.) where the secretary of interior just can't list animals.
2.) where a there needs to be any study.
3.) where that study directly effects the outcome of the ruling.
I know you. You are going to say "look it up yourself". Or something like that. I am saying it does not exist. You will need to show me.
Sorry, I am just getting tired of arguing in circles with you.