Give it 30 minutes of your time

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtra...spiracy_theory

Thanks for the link Lucille!

Originally Posted by WebSlave

Seriously, what sort of problem is this designed to FIX that can be worth this kind of RISK to the population?

From what I gathered with my short attention span, they're trying to cool the earth and stop "global warming". Why the hell are we trying to stop something that's been a cyclical part of our planet's history for millions of years? Nothing but bad can come from mucking with nature on that scale.

Geoengineering technologies fall into three categories: Weather Modification, Solar Radiation Management, and Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration; each is already under intensive research, computer modeling and experimentation.
The first category, Weather Modification -- generally covering "chemical cloud seeding" and "storm modification" (the redirecting of hurricanes) -- is, conceptually, the mother of all geoengineering technologies, already practiced at significant scale in the U.S. and China. In the words of the ETC Group report , such techniques demonstrate "a classic 'end-of-pipe' response that addresses neither the causes nor the mechanism of climate change, but seeks only to alter its outcomes."
The second set of methods is found even more literally at the end of the pipe: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration technologies attempt to remove CO2 from the atmosphere after it has been released. This is done either by mechanical means, through "carbon-sucking machines" (part of the arsenal deployed to put the "clean" in the dubious notion of "clean coal"), by modifying chemical cycles through "Ocean Fertilization" (introducing volumes of iron or nitrogen to the ocean) and "Crop Residue Ocean Permanent Sequestration" (dumping massive amounts of biomass into the sea), or by creating new carbon sinks through manipulation of species (GE algae) and ecosystems (burning biomass through pyrolysis and burying the resulting carbon, popularly promoted as "biochar").
Biochar provides an interesting perspective on both the broad range of geoengineering proposals,

Several more pages continued here,
http://www.alternet.org/story/148587..._the_11th_hour

Thanks Tommy. I found this explanation also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering

I'm not either pro or con at this point, but certainly spraying stuff that ends up back on the earth's surface eventually is a matter of some concern, depending on what is used.

Wiki,Wiki,Wiki . . . . .
Sign up for an account and make "the facts",Your Facts!!

As opposed to the article you supplied, Tommy, whose title starts off 'The Doomsday Machine'....obviously a neutral no-agenda source of information.

CNN,FOX,MSNBC also have "theirs"

Originally Posted by Shadera

From what I gathered with my short attention span, they're trying to cool the earth and stop "global warming". Why the hell are we trying to stop something that's been a cyclical part of our planet's history for millions of years? Nothing but bad can come from mucking with nature on that scale.

Ah, but think deeper about this. They are apparently trying to correct the RESULT of this situation, and not the source cause. So what EXACTLY is the SOURCE of this problem that apparently must be outside of their reach?

Seriously, flooding the atmosphere with ALUMINUM particulates?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1335899/

http://ukpmc.ac.uk/abstract/MED/2680...tk0EpwgAMC2g.0

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1568482/

If the possible result of this procedure is widespread dementia among the world's population, then what is the alternative that must apparently be even worse?

There are some missing pieces to this puzzle........

This may help some of ya'll?

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=185785.0

The buzzword in this case is "geoengineering" or more specifically "climate geoengineering"

"Chemtrails" is a slang term, and when you enter chemtrails into a search engine, you will get a couple of reliable sites, but most of the search engines' results are websites comprised mostly speculation, hypotheses, guesswork, or outlandish kook stuff.