Is the Fall From Grace fatal to the Good Guy Certs?

Thanks Bill (I think).....hey.... you wern't gone very long before showing up to post again......You done with that humble pie alyeady???......I would go back for seconds if I were you.........but what do I know......right?

Originally Posted by Clearwater_Reptiles

you still have 2 more days

Whats the story behind this time frame?

Mr Black,If your reading skills are anywhere near sharp You would Know that on that other thread I was asked to stop posting....And I did that. "There". Humble Pie. Its still there... Me Being gone from this site That wont happen... and trying to make my way back "Time" will tell.

Originally Posted by Ophis

Whats the story behind this time frame?

I have never been Amazed or Agreed with Someone of your "Intellect" Twice in less then a week thought you may be trying to go for a record

Originally Posted by Ophis

Whats the story behind this time frame?

Being as this is Sat, I think, you've got two days left in this week in which we presently find ourselves.

On to another note.

The good guy certification is pretty simple and really doesn't matter whether or not if it's limited to people you've done business with or not. The fact that it does NOT rely only on replies from actual business transactions does make it somewhat more difficult for someone considering a business transaction in that THEY must discern whether or not the folks voting for or against you should be trusted or believed.

Let me give you an example. Here are all the dumbasses voting that I am a bad guy. Note the caliber or person they are and the quality they have brought to this site. Am I worried that ANYONE looking into ANY of them would get the impression that I ACTUALLY am a bad guy? I'll give my patented answer just as soon as I get my throat properly cleared, pardon me a moment.

mi mi mi la la la harumph harumph rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrr mi mi mi ahhhh, there we go

AHAHAHAHahahhahahahahahahahaHHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahAH AHAHAHAHAHahahAHAHAHAHahahAHAHAHAHahahahaHaHHHHaha HAHAHHahaHahAHHahahaH

Bad guy
brucestephenson, bud mierkey, Neil Gubitz 3 12.00%
Voters: 25.

Folks have to be smart enough to check on WHO is for or against whomever they are checking on.

IF you believe everything you read at face value then there is MUCH of which you are blissfully, I hope, unaware.

Look at who and what THEN make your decision.

Originally Posted by wilomn

Being as this is Sat, I think, you've got two days left in this week in which we presently find ourselves.

On to another note.

The good guy certification is pretty simple and really doesn't matter whether or not if it's limited to people you've done business with or not. The fact that it does NOT rely only on replies from actual business transactions does make it somewhat more difficult for someone considering a business transaction in that THEY must discern whether or not the folks voting for or against you should be trusted or believed.

Let me give you an example. Here are all the dumbasses voting that I am a bad guy. Note the caliber or person they are and the quality they have brought to this site. Am I worried that ANYONE looking into ANY of them would get the impression that I ACTUALLY am a bad guy? I'll give my patented answer just as soon as I get my throat properly cleared, pardon me a moment.

mi mi mi la la la harumph harumph rrrrrrrr rrrrrrrr mi mi mi ahhhh, there we go

AHAHAHAHahahhahahahahahahahaHHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahAH AHAHAHAHAHahahAHAHAHAHahahAHAHAHAHahahahaHaHHHHaha HAHAHHahaHahAHHahahaH

Bad guy
brucestephenson, bud mierkey, Neil Gubitz 3 12.00%
Voters: 25.

Folks have to be smart enough to check on WHO is for or against whomever they are checking on.

IF you believe everything you read at face value then there is MUCH of which you are blissfully, I hope, unaware.

Look at who and what THEN make your decision.

Wes,

My calendar has the weeks starting on Sunday, but hey...I still voted ya a "good guy".

Originally Posted by Jim O

Wes,

My calendar has the weeks starting on Sunday, but hey...I still voted ya a "good guy".

Yea.......thats EXACTLY what I was getting at......you know.......someone with my "Intellect" and all.

I still haven't decided which of the two poll answers better fits... IMO it hasn't changed, and it has done its job (and will continue to do so.)

I think a little common sense should be applied here. The purpose of the GGC is clear. If we know Jeffrey Dahmer killed and ate some of his neighbors, just because he didn't kill and eat me personally, it doesn't make him NOT a bad guy. It also doesn't mean that people on the jury at his trial should vote "not guilty" just because they were not murdered by him.

As far as the rule changes, if it has an intended purpose and that purpose is not being served because of flaws in the rules, the obvious answer is to change the rules. Again, let's use some common sense.

Originally Posted by Jim O

I'd "red-dot" this one too but I'm afraid that you'd be all weekend. There was no "frenzy". If I would have thought that you deserved more reason than the obvious one I would have given one, but since you have asked, here goes. I think Dennis answered it well and even slackass with whom I might tend to disagree with about a great many things hit the nail on the head. Putting this at the end of a thread really did no good but draw attention to yourself and was nothing but a thinly veiled attack. Want to go toe to toe, I'm there, but don't try to justify it as being something more noble than it is.

As far as this goes, I don't care what you think of me, Jim. Not even one tiny bit. You have made yourself crystal clear. What you've shown is you believe that the moment you are done with your off-topic argument, that is the end of the thread and nobody else is allowed to post. Obviously this thread had plenty more life in it, as evidenced by the continued posting...

Originally Posted by Clearwater_Reptiles

good one this will be my last responce to Mr Black on account of I see A hi-jacking coming

Substance.......think Substance BIll.

Originally Posted by Serpwidgets

As far as this goes, I don't care what you think of me, Jim. Not even one tiny bit.

The why did you whine about Rep Points in the first place? And why keep responding? Isn't this a case of Queen Gertrude saying "The lady doth protest too much, methinks"?