Notices |
Hello!
Either you have not registered on this site yet, or you are registered but have not logged in. In either case, you will not be able to use the full functionality of this site until you have registered, and then logged in after your registration has been approved.
Registration is FREE, so please register so you can participate instead of remaining a lurker....
Please note that the information requested during registration will be used to determine your legitimacy as a participant of this site. As such, any information you provide that is determined to be false, inaccurate, misleading, or highly suspicious will result in your registration being rejected. This is designed to try to discourage as much as possible those spammers and scammers that tend to plague sites of this nature, to the detriment of all the legitimate members trying to enjoy the features this site provides for them.
Of particular importance is the REQUIREMENT that you provide your REAL full name upon registering. Sorry, but this is not like other sites where anonymity is more the rule.
Also your TRUE location is important. If the location you enter in your profile field does not match the location of your registration IP address, then your registration will be rejected. As such, I strongly urge registrants to avoid using a VPN service to register, as they are often used by spammers and scammers, and as such will be blocked when discovered when auditing new registrations.
Sorry about all these hoops to jump through, but I am quite serious about blocking spammers and scammers at the gate on this site and am doing the very best that I can to that effect. Trust me, I would rather be doing more interesting things with my time, and wouldn't be making this effort if I didn't think it was worthwhile.
|
Genetics, Taxonomy, Hybridization General discussions about the science of genetics as well as the ever changing face of taxonomy. Issues concerning hybridization are welcome here as well. |
06-25-2006, 11:02 PM
|
#1
|
|
Bug Eyed Leucistic Rat Snakes - should they be culled?
Some genetic morphs come with undesirable traits. Bug eyes in leucistic rat snakes is one of them. I've seen this to varying degrees and I've seen some offered for sale. I don't think that these snakes should continue in breeding populations and should be culled at birth.
As far as people making these snakes only as pets and promising not to breed them... well some of them may never be bred but some may end up breeding anyway.
What are your thoughts on the subject?
|
|
|
06-25-2006, 11:08 PM
|
#2
|
|
That's a touchy situation. It's impossible to guarantee they they would always remain a pet and never be bred. Even with a contract the breeder would be unlikely to prove anything one way or the other. Even if they suspected that the animal was being bred. Do the bug eyes lower the quality of life in the rat snakes?
|
|
|
06-25-2006, 11:21 PM
|
#3
|
|
Quote:
Do the bug eyes lower the quality of life in the rat snakes?
|
That's something I was also wondering. Can any rat snake people answer this question? Do these snakes have any other health issues, with or without the bug eyes?
|
|
|
06-26-2006, 07:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
It is my understanding that the original wild-caught Leucistic Rat Snake was a Bug-Eyed male. The entire bloodline traces back to this animal. I don't work with this species myself (they are the "Spawn of Satan" as babies), but I work very closely with John Schmitt of Suncoast Herps and he has been producing them for many years.
None of his breeders are Bug-Eyed, but a percentage of every clutch will demonstrate the trait. I'm not certain if anyone has ever proven the genetic makeup of the trait, but it would be interesting to see if it could be bred out.
|
|
|
06-26-2006, 04:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
I've seen photos of wild caught normals that look to be pretty (adv. To a fair degree; moderately, not like pretty) bug eyed, so I don't think it's as clean cut of a question, as say should blind or one eyed snakes [genetically predisposed], be culled.
|
|
|
06-27-2006, 12:09 AM
|
#6
|
|
Quote:
I've seen photos of wild caught normals that look to be pretty (adv. To a fair degree; moderately, not like pretty) bug eyed,
|
So is it a rat snake problem more so than a leucistic problem? I honestly didn't know about wc bug eyed ratsnakes. Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
06-27-2006, 01:18 AM
|
#7
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Klass
So is it a rat snake problem more so than a leucistic problem? I honestly didn't know about wc bug eyed ratsnakes. Thanks for the info.
|
I don't know enough about it myself. I have a leucistic pair, but they don't produce the bug eyes. Whenever I see ads for leucistic I always make sure that it's mentioned that they don't have bug eyes, if it says they do, I move on, so I've never really paid enough attention to know how much worse (if it is worse) the "syndrome" or "defect" is than the photos I've seen of some wild caught normals.
|
|
|
06-29-2006, 04:23 PM
|
#8
|
|
Bug Eyes
Guys we have been working with the leu. Tx. Rats for about 20 + years and the original male wild caught did not have bug eyes. I personally held him at the Houston Zoo many years ago. He was a totally white animal, but had all the other norml charactoristics. The bug eyes were the result of inbreeding of the line and can be corrected by out crossing a couple of different sourced leucistics with several normal females to produce hets and then breeding the hets back to each other from separate females. It corrects itself in one generation and if good breeding practices are the followed, we don't outcross to normals for at least 4 or 5 years. Of course that is easy for me to say when the normals are so prevalent here around the Houston, Texas area.
Our two cents worth,
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms
|
|
|
07-19-2006, 11:20 AM
|
#9
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Cherry
Guys we have been working with the leu. Tx. Rats for about 20 + years and the original male wild caught did not have bug eyes. I personally held him at the Houston Zoo many years ago. He was a totally white animal, but had all the other norml charactoristics. The bug eyes were the result of inbreeding of the line and can be corrected by out crossing a couple of different sourced leucistics with several normal females to produce hets and then breeding the hets back to each other from separate females. It corrects itself in one generation and if good breeding practices are the followed, we don't outcross to normals for at least 4 or 5 years. Of course that is easy for me to say when the normals are so prevalent here around the Houston, Texas area.
Our two cents worth,
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms
|
BRAVO!!! Great post. I think that summed up how bug eyed are cured in a line, but to cull off babies that show bug eyes? No idea
|
|
|
07-19-2006, 12:03 PM
|
#10
|
|
Not my Call
I appreciate the kudo's, but I intentionally stayed away from the "culled" question due to a major flame war/debate several years ago over culling of a kinked back hybrid. So I guess it was a little chicken of me to do so. So with that said, yes in order to preserve the viability of the animals in my opinion the bugged animals should be eventually culled from the hobby as they display a genetic defect and are in our experience less viable as captives from a breeding and birth defect standpoint.
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms
|
|
|
Join
now to reply to this thread or open new ones
for your questions & comments! FaunaClassifieds.com
is the largest online community about Reptile
& Amphibians, Snakes, Lizards and number one
classifieds service with thousands of ads to look
for. Registration is open to everyone and FREE.
Click Here to Register!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.
|
|